Talk:Shauna Sand

Jewish
Dunno if this is relevant, but years ago when Shauna Sand (while married to Lamas) was interviewed by Joan Rivers on the red carpet, Joan made some kind of joke about Shauna not being Jewish, and Shauna said she was Jewish on one side of her family. Ruth E (talk) 22:42, 5 May 2008 (UTC) Doesn't it only count when person's mother is Jewish? Norum (talk) 02:08, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

XXX
She's included in the pornography category...but has she actually done any porn? If not she doesnt really deserve to be in that group. Norum (talk) 20:57, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Are you referring to the American adult models category? That's due to her work in Playboy and is not the same as "XXX" or hardcore as you seem to think.  Dismas |(talk) 21:00, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

No - Start-Class Pornography articles | Low-importance Pornography articles | WikiProject Pornography articles | Start-Class Low-importance Pornography articles. Since she has not done pornography, these groups should not be in. Norum (talk) 04:58, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * That's a WikiProject banner, not an actual category. I presume her article falls under that project's interest because she has been in Playboy which is adult in nature (ie pornography).  Pinkadelica ♣  08:49, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

I am also talking about the categories below. But I do not think this should be included as pornography, because Playboy is not a pornographic company and nudity is not the same as pornography. True, some Playboy models did appear in pornographic movies, but not in the case of Shauna Sands. Norum (talk) 10:43, 17 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Playboy falls under the pornography umbrella because of their erotic depictions of women. Is that better?  We aren't saying that Sand was in pornography, it's just the name of the WikiProject that keeps track of this article.  Dismas |(talk) 12:11, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

It could be simply under nudity or erotica, instead of the pornography umbrella. Norum (talk) 10:36, 18 August 2009 (UTC)


 * There is no Wikiproject "Nudity" or "Erotica" because, all semantics aside, those both fall under the heading of pornography. The banner itself makes no claim that the subject has done adult movies or anything of that nature. The subject has, however, done adult modeling which again, is considered pornography whether you believe it is art or not. If you have a problem with the banner or what it represents, I would suggest visiting the project page and expressing your concern.  Pinkadelica ♣  23:20, 18 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Actually, there is a WikiProject Nudity but it deals more with naturism than erotica. But you're right in that the concerns should be voiced elsewhere.  Sand is just one model who posed for Playboy, if you (Norum) have a problem with the idea of WikiProject Pornography overseeing her article, then you should take it up on their talk page.  Dismas |(talk) 02:57, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Well, she's definately in the business now. Glenn Francis (talk) 06:28, 30 October 2009 (UTC) http://www.xbiznewswire.com/view.php?id=114084