Talk:Shaw (woodland)

Wiktionary
User:Goldenrowley has just tagged this article as "move to Wiktionary", saying there's an article for it there (shaw).

I agree that the current Shaw (woodland) article is brief – but is that not to be expected for a stub? I do think that there is already too much material for a dictionary entry though, and there is surely plenty more to be added. Richard New Forest (talk) 20:22, 21 March 2009 (UTC)