Talk:She's Got Nothing On (But the Radio)

Redirecting to the album article
I don't know why this article is usually redirected to the article regarding the Charm School album, when it's about a different matter. I reverse the changes as soon as I can, but it's annoying anyway. Does anybody know a way to prevent this?

Faezdel (talk) 19:16, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Why? Because the article as is fails notability requirements for songs. The single hasn't been released yet and there are no reliable sources. The source listed discusses the album that you say this article has nothing to do with. It should be redirected. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 01:44, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

The single has been confirmed by 3 different sources. Per Gessle (of Roxette) confirmed it's release, through Twitter under @PartyCrasher and both D&D (Roxette's management) and EMI have also confirmed it in a press release. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.148.132.127 (talk) 00:27, 11 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Just because a single release has been announced, that does not make the song notable enough for its own article. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 01:32, 11 December 2010 (UTC)


 * I've seen less relevant matters having a proper article here too. In addition, this is just an stub and may be expanded later, with worldwide release dates, chart stats and so on. Don't know what's your problem.
 * Faezdel (talk) 18:51, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
 * We have rules at WP:NSONGS that state that unless a song has independent coverage, charts or awards (or is covered by several notable artists) it is not notable for its own article. Stub or not... articles have to earn notability its not inherited. --  Lil_℧niquℇ №1 &#124;  talk2me  18:54, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Forgive me if I'm wrong, but I thought this article would be about the single--the tangible release, that is--not just the song. I can understand forgoing an article solely for the song itself, but this is a confirmed two-track single release with--I'm guessing--enough confirmed information now to warrant an article. TheOddLinguist (talk) 18:00, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Redirected again. The first source is about the new album by Roxette with no mention of the song. The second source is retail site. No one is saying that this has not been released as a single, but that does not make it notable. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 00:57, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Surely it is notabl now that it has charted in Spain and in a few other countries —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.29.197.246 (talk) 05:33, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Does anyone on this page read WP:NSONGS? Beyond notability (charting etc.), A SONG MUST HAVE INDEPENDENT THIRD PARTY RELIABLE SOURCES PROVIDING COVERAGE FOR A DETAILED PAGE. sheesh! --  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  [talk]  05:41, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Also provide some sources for the charts here... --  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  [talk]  05:42, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I can't help but feel like part of the problem is a misunderstood distinction between a song and a single. That very WP:NSONGS page makes such a distinction, and I would tend to think the notability guidelines in question would be based more towards the album notability requirements than those of a song.  This article would be for a released single, not just a random song from the album.  Regarding charting, there have been digital download charting figures  as well as radioplay numbers .  There has also been coverage of the single release, mostly because it's (essentially) the first single from Roxette in about 10 years.  If this still isn't sufficient, please let me know what more (specifically) is required; I'm quite certain I'll be able to find it out there.  (Forgive the potentially incorrect formatting of my post.) TheOddLinguist (talk) 00:41, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
 * It appears you can't use ref tags in these messages. Can someone advise how I should include these links?  Thanks. TheOddLinguist (talk) 00:45, 30 January 2011 (UTC)


 * The single has reached #36 in Belgium (Flanders) . (Replace ref tags with square brackets.) Mattg82 (talk) 01:53, 30 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Updated my post above; thanks. TheOddLinguist (talk) 20:58, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

Page moved as requested. If the 'But' really should be 'but' feel free to make that change. Vegaswikian (talk) 21:20, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

She's Got Nothing On (But The Radio) → She's Got Nothing On (But the Radio) — Per standard naming conventions, the 'T' in the should not be capitalised. &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  [talk]  19:28, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Support per nom. Jenks24 (talk) 18:48, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Support per nom. ℥nding · start 10:48, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment, oppose and support - sort of! "She’s Got Nothing On (but the Radio)" -.
 * However the most common title seems to be "She's Got Nothing On (But The Radio)", as most sites seem to capitalise the first letter in all the words. Chaosdruid (talk) 21:26, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on She's Got Nothing On (But the Radio). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio2/music/playlist/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 08:06, 4 July 2016 (UTC)