Talk:She: A History of Adventure/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 13:50, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * She is part of the adventure subgenre of literature which was especially popular around the turn of the 19th century, but which remains an important form of fiction to the present day. This should be turn of the 20th century as the work was published in 1886. I reworded this.
 * I made a number of minor fixes.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * I assume good faith for all print sources. All online sources are live and support the assertions,
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Thorough and focussed
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * All OK
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * An interesting and well researched article. I am happy to award GA status.
 * Pass/Fail:
 * An interesting and well researched article. I am happy to award GA status.