Talk:She (1965 film)

Fair use rationale for Image:She movie.jpg
Image:She movie.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:35, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Rationale corrected to include reference to this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnmc (talk • contribs) 07:09, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

My Apologies...
I did not know until very recently, and upon seeing again one of my child-hood favorite Sci-Fi movies, the 1965 film "She" staring Ursala Andres that Haggards novel was so revolutionary in helping to create the "lost worlds", and "sword and sorscery" sub-genres (along with Jules Verne") what influence he had in literature.  I never read Haggard's work. Had I done so, needless to say, I would have had a much deeper undertanding of the theoronics of science-fiction\fantasy; not only the allegory to the questioning of the permeance of then-mordern (imperial?) civilization, but also with the TV series "Lost" there are even recognizable elements of "She" in the series. Of course I mean the character of Richard Alpert fits perfectly the profile of Aeysha: A haunted soul who voluntarily allowed himself to become immortal, partly over his guilt of losing his loving wife (an eternal love, lost); and the conditions that he later, with the same resolutelness reliquishes this dubious "grace" of immortality with forgiveness. I do swear, these British fiction classics were more rooted in geo-politics and pyscholgy and than anything else! --67.86.101.6 (talk) 17:54, 23 October 2011 (UTC)Veryverser