Talk:Sheffield incest case

Article name and scope
In spirit with my WP:BLP1E, I think we need to restructure the article to cover the event rather than the person. I agree that the current state of the article is much better and I commend Sticky for his tremendous work expanding it, but as with Josef Fritzl which redirects to Fritzl case, we should do the same with this article. Regards  So Why  08:18, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Strongly agree. JohnCD (talk) 23:00, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Sheffield incest case. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090122110422/http://itn.co.uk:80/news/fd565027c0747f9ca568a437fe87f679.html to http://itn.co.uk/news/fd565027c0747f9ca568a437fe87f679.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 08:42, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Gordon Brown quote
I restored Gordon Brown as the source of the quote in the first sentence of "Response of government and local authorities". This had been changed in a fairly obvious act of vandalism in this edit:. I can't find a source for the exact quote given but he did say something similar in an answer to Clegg at PMQs on 26 November 2008, see here: --rbrwr&plusmn; 07:34, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Difficult to understand sentence
The following sentence under the heading "British Fritzl" is hard to understand: "Unlike in previous cases, no disclosure of police records or child protection files by corrupt (ex)-professionals who had worked the case was necessary for him to be exposed notwithstanding the injunctions." Hopefully someone familiar with the intention could fix it, thanks.