Talk:Shellshock (software bug)

Comments
The name of the bug is spelled "Shellshock" (no StudlyCaps) in Red Hat's security advisory. The name "shellshocked" only occurs in the given source as a tag. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 19:39, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Actually, Red Hat doesn't give it a name at all. The ShellShock name is based on the posting by Troy Hunt. I'll admit to the mistake of the mixed case name. No arguments to moving to Shellshock (computer bug). WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:42, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Proposed merge with Shellshock vulnerability
Same bug. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 20:08, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

These should all be moved under a title of CVE-2014-7169 (Edprevost (talk) 20:05, 25 September 2014 (UTC)


 * No, there are two CVE numbers, CVE-2014-6721 and CVE-2014-7169, so naming the article after one of them is wrong. Shellshock is a good name, since it covers both. Thue (talk) 22:18, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

I have taken the liberty of redirecting everything to this article, and overwriting this article with my version since it seemed more fleshed out. Feel free to merge anything from the two other old versions ( and ). Thue (talk) 22:18, 25 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Ideally, this needs following up with a formal merge to bring the page histories together. I propose the following structure:
 * Shellshock (software bug) (current page; target for all merges)
 * CVE-2014-6721 (first source of merge)
 * Shellshock vulnerability (second source of merge)
 * The two sources would then remain as redirects to Shellshock (software bug), potentially also with another redirect at "CVE-2014-7169".
 * Any objections? — Sasuke Sarutobi (talk) 23:16, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Logos
Just because some hacker on the web creates a piece of artwork in response to this vulnerability, that hardly qualifies it as an official logo. (Since when do software bugs get logos anyway?) WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:45, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

These aren't official, this is simply documenting the history, you know, like an encyclopedia. So when we look back as a security community it will have been preserved. But thanks for slowing me down. :0) Edprevost 20:52, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The point isn't to document every blip that occurs along the trail, but to wait for the trail to be stable, and document the things that remained notable over time. So, each and every possible logo that has been created within a day of the announcement is really over the top. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 21:22, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Edprevost, you should probably do the sensible thing and delete these "logos" before the entire wikipedia community gangs up on you. There is no way in which these daft pictures are "documenting the history ... like an encyclopedia". Pasicles (talk) 21:34, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

sad panda can we at least get it under the CVE name? Edprevost (talk) 21:46, 25 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Not understanding the "sad panda" response, but we have now three separate editors who have either reverted the addition of the logos or advised for their removal. Can we assume we have WP:CONSENSUS to remove them? As for the "Simple Proof" figure, also created by, this appears to be a screenshot off of his own Linux box, so we really have only his word that this is any valid evidence of anything, making for more WP:OR. I tried to remove this, but was reverted, with an accompanying note at my talk page. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 21:54, 25 September 2014 (UTC)


 * I was expressing an emotion WikiDan61, my apologies. I removed the logos. As for the exploit image, to better understand it, and the attack, please see CVE2014-7169 Edprevost (talk) 22:15, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Yes, please drop the logos for now, IMO. Thue (talk) 22:19, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

For my own education, How is the testing section any different then me providing the same content in a screenshot? Edprevost (talk) 22:32, 25 September 2014 (UTC)


 * The testing section in text actually allows you to cut and paste the tests. Which you need to do if you want to test your own locally installed Bash. Also, text is always better than equivalent image, because you can manipulate it easily. Thue (talk) 22:36, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject banners
I've tagged the article for WikiProjects Computer Security, Apple, and Linux; at high, mid, and mid importance respectively, and start-class. Please feel free to amend the importance ratings if you feel otherwise. — Sasuke Sarutobi (talk) 23:46, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Protection or review process?
I imagine that many people will be coming to this article looking for more information. There are code examples on the page which some users will surely try to run (it seems that they are there, in part, to allow users to self-test). This is of course a good target for malicious wiki users who could change that example code and make users damage their computers. So I think it would be good to have some form of protection on the page at least for a week, so that that can't happen. CodeCat (talk) 00:17, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Section about CVE-2014-7169 vulnerability details
In my opinion, the details provided in this section are incorrect and misleading. What is presented as bash vulnerability, is in fact a correct and expected behavior. Specifically, by executing command line in form of variable=value command, it is expected that the command is executed. This is the reason why this purported "vulnerability" is seen in all shells. On the other hand, the vulnerability test included in "Testing" section is correct, provided that system uses bash as sh. 129.112.109.243 (talk) 00:46, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
 * I just fixed it. The rest of the section appeared to have been based on the incorrect example that was there before, so I just deleted that part.  I'm not sure what was meant by the sentence "The consequences are identical to the original CVE-2014-6271 vulnerability".  ~User:chridd tʃɹɪː|Special:Contributions]] 01:49, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The HELLO_WORLD_VAR example is still broken; the way it stands, `HELLO_WORLD_VAR= { ...` will define `HELLO_WORLD_VAR` to be ``, and throw syntax error on the rest of the line. The content of the variable should be quoted.136.187.146.174 (talk) 07:05, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Please study my example below {user:chridd} Thank you for correcting that rm example that was wrong, but it is important to capture the vulnerability across the other shells, please put the other shell examples back. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edprevost (talk • contribs) 02:05, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

This is not seen in all shells by design, the newly patched systems, patched to bash-4.1.2-15.19 via Amazon have a protection in place, but ONLY for BASH, hence the creation of CVE 2014-7169

Edprevost (talk) 01:40, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Are you saying that that shows that csh has the vulnerability? It doesn't look that way to me; csh is echoing "date", as it's supposed to, and not executing the "date" command like bash is doing.  The file "echo" still exists from when you exploited the vulnerability in bash (and, just to be sure csh wasn't creating the file again, I ran the command on my own computer; no new files were created, and there's still no "echo" file). ~User:chridd tʃɹɪː|Special:Contributions]] 02:17, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Gotcha I see my mistake now, I would delete the file then run bash to check the system was patched and then immediately run the command in another shell. Edprevost (talk) 02:26, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

I recommend this section be removed completely. It appears to be Edprevost's own interpretation of the bug, and his own attempt to reproduce it. As such, it is purely WP:OR and has no place in a Wikipedia article. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:56, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

This is an example of CVE 2014-7169. In which a local file is written with the contents of 'date'; it is not an "interpretation", it IS the bug. On what technical/academic grounds are you qualified to be commenting on this WikiDan61] [[User:Edprevost|Edprevost (talk) 13:06, 26 September 2014 (UTC)


 * The question is, on what academic grounds are you qualified to assert that this code snippet represents the bug in question. Wikipedia has a standard of verifiability that requires that facts such as this be cited to reliable sources. Creating your own knowledge and inserting it into articles is considered original research and is disallowed. Whether or not you are a recognized authority, the material must first be published in a source where proper editorial or peer review is in place before it can be asserted here at Wikipedia. Dem's da rulz, like 'em or not. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:24, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

This is my area and industry of expertise, please read the references supplied by myself and others WikiDan61, the examples given by those working on this page are taken from the references. Edprevost (talk) 13:29, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
 * If examples are taken from sources, cite the sources. But the discussion in this section implies that you and are tweaking code to reproduce the bug, which would be original research. I don't doubt your expertise in this area, but Wikipedia has rules about publishing original research. Your code snippet, if not previously published in a reliable source as an example of this bug in action, is not verifiable, and has no place.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:35, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Please see the references Edprevost (talk) 13:47, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The article has many references. From which reference did you pull the particular code snippet in question? WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:52, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Please see Edprevost (talk) 18:45, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Requested move 25 September 2014

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: not moved &mdash;innotata 06:07, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Shellshock (software bug) → Shellshocked (computer security) – Incorrect Title – Edprevost (talk) 19:37, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
 * This is a contested technical request (permalink). Steel1943  (talk) 21:40, 25 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Shellshock (or "Shell Shock") is used by The Register, Red Hat, Troy Hunt Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 20:00, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Shellshocked is what the researcher who found it, named it securityblog.redhat.com/tag/shellshocked/Edprevost (talk) 20:05, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The researcher tagged the post as "shellshocked", never named it in the article itself. In my interpretation, he was shocked by the shell behaviour, thus "shellshocked" tag as an adjective, describing his state of mind, not naming the vulnerability.136.187.146.174 (talk) 07:09, 26 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Really it should be CVE-2014-6271 as the title, then have the various names. Edprevost (talk) 20:15, 25 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Oppose - We use common names and not official names for article titles. I doubt many outside the tech/security arena would use CVE-2014-6271. If news articles are using Shellshock and ShellShock, then that is more likely to be the common name then Shellshocked. That said it might be better to name this Shellshock (security bug) as it would be a little more precise. PaleAqua (talk) 04:54, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Oppose - FWIW - seems the New York Times, a worthy representative of the news media, is using the term "Shellshock" software bug - see < ref name="NYT-20140925-NP"> - same as the name of the present article - maybe good enough for now? - in any case - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 11:59, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Oppose - It's there even when there is no apparent security risk and it can potentially cause software to run incorrectly when there is no malicious intent, irrespective of the security risks.  Sparkie82 ( t • c )  19:37, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Section "Log parsing"
I created that section and, yes, it's OR. Someone will eventually figure it out and write about it, if they haven't already. This probably falls under WP:IAR because it's too important to get that information out there.  Sparkie82 ( t • c )  19:46, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
 * In an edit comment, Chillum said: "I cannot think of even on log parser that stores log entries in bash variable. Citation really needed"
 * Where do you store line/field data from logs in your Bash scripts? I can't think of a single IT guy with any experience who doesn't use Bash to write quick scripts to scrub or sift logs. Google quickly yielded four examples: http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/58550/how-to-view-the-output-of-a-running-process-in-another-bash-session http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6143838/bash-script-log-file-display-to-screen-continuously http://mesastar.org/tools-utilities/python-based-stuff/history-log-scrubber/view http://oclug.on.ca/archives/oclug/2005-January/043294.html
 * And as I said, this clearly falls under WP:IAR. If you want to change the section name/scope to a more general title like offline processing or something like that, go ahead.  Sparkie82 ( t • c )  17:36, 27 September 2014 (UTC)


 * I don't think it should be included without a source showing it exists. I could make 50 sections right now based on vulnerabilities that might exist in home made scripts. While IAR does allow you to ignore the rules to improve or maintain Wikipedia I believe the inclusion of original research does not improve or maintain Wikipedia.


 * If this is a real concern then you should be able to find a security expert describing it. While there are many venues where a potential vulnerability that you thought up are very appropriate and encyclopedia is not one. We should not create new information, we should document information already created by reliable sources. Chillum 17:41, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
 * +1 The article will start becoming a beastial collection of every possible attaakck, and with a compromised shell, that is quite literally anything the system can do. Ed Prevost profile|contributions  — Preceding undated comment added 18:04, 27 September 2014 (UTC)


 * I understand the rule and why we have it. However, if every bit of OR on WP was removed, WP would only have a 1/3 of the information it has -- especially in articles on software and technology. We could change the scope of the section to discuss, generally, how the bug effects machines running offline with examples of how that works. Those examples could be backed up with cites from programming reference sources.  Sparkie82 ( t • c )  18:03, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
 * As it is now, it is incorrect to give the impression that the bug only affects machines connected to the internet.  Sparkie82 ( t • c )  18:06, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
 * As a security expert, I wouldn't expect an exhaustive list here. Instead, I would anticipate a detailed description of how the vulnerability works, so I could go and test it in various scenarios. I think the opening and other portions ofy the article demonstrate clearly that it' not limited to internet connected systems only. Ed Prevost profile|contributions 18:11, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

I would say that 's most recent edit brings it into line with policy while improving the article. Thanks.

removing all of the original research and having a smaller encyclopedia as a result would be a dramatic improvement. Quality of content is more important than quantity. If you look at our featured articles you will see there are rather long and contain little to no original research. Chillum 18:26, 27 September 2014 (UTC)


 * If we are ok with the current edit, I'll remove the cite and OR. Agreed? Ed Prevost profile|contributions 18:35, 27 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Yes I don't think they apply anymore and I have removed them. Generally these templates go after the disputed text and not in the section header. Chillum 18:46, 27 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Noted, thanks for the help and education  Ed Prevost profile|contributions 18:51, 27 September 2014 (UTC)


 * To summerize and close the loop on this older discussion: I wanted an exception to the OR rules to include some info I thought important to include in the article. Others disageed. End of discussion.  Sparkie82 ( t • c )  22:30, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

CVE-2014-7186 and CVE-2014-7187
While working on patching Shellshock, Red Hat researcher Florian Weimer found two more bugs, CVE-2014-7186 and CVE-2014-7187, according to https://securityblog.redhat.com/2014/09/26/frequently-asked-questions-about-the-shellshock-bash-flaws/. Could someone please add this to the text if appropriate? I need to get to bed. One can also dig through the relevant mailing list at http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/ for more information. Thanks in advance. Jesse Viviano (talk) 04:38, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Added Jesse Vivano, thanks :0) Edprevost (talk) 04:50, 27 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Why are these vulnerabilities being added to the Shellshock article? They are not vulnerabilities in the function export mechanism, nor does the source cited to connect them actually do so that I can see. 50.185.134.48 (talk) 20:54, 27 September 2014 (UTC)


 * They are related, according to the reporter, Red Hat, but the specifics of the relationship hasn't been disclosed in detail yet see Red Hat Holding For release Ed Prevost</b> profile|contributions 21:00, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Tidy-up
It's natural for a fast-moving topic like this to result in a article that's messy - but can we start tidying up?


 * Think about structure - looking at Heartbleed a "History" section might be useful
 * The "shellshocker" site link is inappropriate, given that we have many authoritative sources
 * Quoting text straight from "...email addressed to the oss-sec..." is a Primary Source

Snori (talk) 09:04, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

About shellshocker.net's red link
Should I remove the red link (or probably link it externally). I think there isn't so much sense putting it as an red link. - gacelperfinian&#40;talk in &#45; error&#63; Start [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gacelperfinian&action=edit a new topic] &#41; 07:42, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅ - yes - agreed - adj to italics - at least for now - hope this helps - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 13:07, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

How the bug works, rewrite section
I rewrote the section, CVE-2014-6271, as:

The bug manifests itself as Bash is starting up. When Bash is invoked, it erroneously processes trailing strings after function definitions in the values of environment variables from its parent process. This allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted environment.

The bug requires that an environment variable be defined with a function that uses closed parentheses and brackets followed by arbitrary code, such as:

When a subsequent command invokes Bash, Bash processes the environment from its parent process, including the malformed environment variable. When the malformed environment variable is processed, the bug causes the trailing arbitrary code to execute before running the subsequent command, such as:

The stackexchange reference was removed with the edit.  Sparkie82 ( t • c )  17:28, 28 September 2014 (UTC)


 * I think this is a good change, and much better than the old section. I like breaking it up into the export and the bash call, as you've done, rather than just displaying the whole exploit as a single block. We may want to include a full example for the first CVE, but I'm not opposed to using that format for describing the other CVEs. The description is much better than what was there as well. IRW0 (talk) 19:28, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Selfpub sources and tag
I agree there are too many selfpub sources, as you tagged the article. I think some are used appropriately in the article, though. Specs and manpages seem vaguely okay, and I think it's fine to reference security releases from Ubuntu, Redhat, etc, in certain cases. Blogs from sources known in the field like Qualys may be okay, at least for now. I think the Zalewski blog about the Florian Wiemer patch should go, as it doesn't match the apparent corresponding patch. There's a Twitter ref too. I'm going to remove both of those things. Which selfpub sources did you have an issue with? IRW0 (talk) 19:02, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Actually, I tagged it rather than removing the cites myself because I didn't want to get into a bunch of pissing matches here. Just refer to WP:RS. Good luck.  Sparkie82 ( t • c )  19:52, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The difficulty here is that it is very common within the security community to use mediums of communication, typically considered unfit for wiki references. Consider that almost all of this information has come from blogs and mailing lists, to date. My argument is Occamian, lets keep these references, and then update them as things mature and progress to more vetted publications. <b style="color:#006699;">Ed Prevost</b> profile|contributions 12:58, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
 * This is true, and needs to factor into our RS evaluation. It's okay if we're missing some information until more sources cover it, since those who want to know more technical detail can find it on the web. We may be able to add some blog sources that meet the last point of WP:USERG to make the material properly referenced. Mailing list sources and original research aren't really great, though. IRW0 (talk) 00:20, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

More Self pub stuff added by, it's great history, but is once again coming from Blogs and newslists; which is just how the Security community is. <b style="color:#006699;">Ed Prevost</b> profile|contributions 22:14, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
 * per http://www.cnet.com/news/bigger-than-heartbleed-bash-bug-could-leave-it-systems-shellshocked/

says "quarter-century-old security flaw", and http://www.inquisitr.com/1508290/shellshock-vulnerability-went-undetected-for-25-years/ states "gone undetected for 25 years", but neither states its sources nor pinpoints the exact date the way the bash source code does. <b style="color:#006699;">Ed Prevost</b> profile|contributions 22:25, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
 * If you're going to nuke ACCURATE references to the actual source code commit date while waiting for a periodical publication to pick up on it, at least please ALSO nuke the INACCURATE 1992 date. The design flaw dates back to 1989, whether or not journalists care about the specific date. Ericblake (talk) 22:40, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Feel free too, I lekely didn't see it. <b style="color:#006699;">Ed Prevost</b> profile|contributions 00:19, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Shellshocker.net
Can someone please do a write up of shellshocker.net? It's one of the most up to date resources and provides information on how to test and patch your system. It was the first available online shellshock vulnerability testing service that has provided over 42164 Total tests to date (as of the writing of this). It was originally on this page but has been removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.19.8.213 (talk) 22:09, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
 * What sort of "write up"? I don't think it provides any information the article lacks, and I'm not comfortable including it as an external link, especially since at the very top it states: "curl https://shellshocker.net/fixbash | sh". Encouraging users to pipe the output of a script from a random remote server into a shell is a really fucking bad idea, especially when you're trying to fix a vulnerability, so directing Wikipedia users to such a site is harmful.
 * Additionally, I notice that your IP address is located in Fort Wayne, IN, where the company hosting shellshocker.net is based, and the only contributions you've made have been to add shellshocker.net to the article. (As the "official" site, even though the domain wasn't created until the day after the bug was released from embargo.) While I'm not accusing you of anything, you can see why that might be suspicious. IRW0 (talk) 22:38, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
 * I had actually added the shellshocker.net section to this article, only for the sake of quick access while the article was developing, as it had more information than the article did at the time. I do agree, regardless of the intentions of {u|184.19.8.213} that, this is not an appropriate source for this article. At least not to the degree that it should have it's own section. <b style="color:#006699;">Ed Prevost</b> profile|contributions 12:46, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Shellshocker.net has an example of CVE-2014-6278 and a patch for it as well, this wikipedia article still has no information on CVE-2014-6278. Right now developers and system administrators are trusting shellshocker.net as the primary source for updated information about ShellShock. The GitHub repo is updated several times daily with new tests, fixes, etc. 64.186.39.3 (talk) 18:25, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Others, and I have seen this, but there is no authoritative reference for what they are claiming is the actual issue being held behind that particular CVE. Do you have another reference? <b style="color:#006699;">Ed Prevost</b> profile|contributions 18:36, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The IP 64.186.39.3 is registered to "MEDICAL INFORMATICS ENGINEERING, INC.", who run shellshocker.net. It's appropriate to mention that you are affiliated with a site when you're suggesting its inclusion in an encyclopedia article. (Please read the conflict of interest policy if you have not.) In any case, we would need a reliable source to state that people are trusting this site as you claim, and that it is the "primary source" of information about Shellshock. The site itself is a potential security problem, as noted above, so it also cannot be included as the external links policy prohibits malicious scripts and similar. (And the site fails the EL policy on several other grounds.) IRW0 (talk) 23:53, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Also, you are of course welcome to add information about CVE-2014-6278 (or anything else you think is missing), since the article is open to editing by anyone. Rather than just suggesting we link to a site, adding that info to the article is the best way to help out! (Just keep in mind that reliable sources need to be cited.) IRW0 (talk) 04:57, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Mediawiki affected?
Does the software from The Wikipedia as used in many other wikis suffer from this vulnerability? 194.176.105.153 (talk) 09:34, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
 * No. However, wikipedia, and any other software running on a system that uses a vulnerable version of bash could potentially be leveraged by an attacker as, notes below.  <b style="color:#006699;">Ed Prevost</b> profile|contributions 12:51, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
 * In the MediaWiki source, "includes/GlobalFunctions.php" calls bash in a widely used "wfShellExec" function, which you could potentially get at by uploading an image or other things. Whether or not MediaWiki is vulnerable itself isn't the right question, but it is a potential attack vector with a vulnerable version of bash. IRW0 (talk) 13:18, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks. That was what I meant, in my sloppily-phrased way.  194.176.105.153 (talk) 17:54, 29 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Should that function specify usage of Korn shell or TCSH instead (or plain old sh ?) ? -- 65.94.171.225 (talk) 20:35, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Specific exploitation vectors
I don't like this section. It truly would be pages long if we attempted to create every possible entry here. I think the first paragraph can stay, but from CGI-based web server attack to Note of offline system vulnerability should go, and the other CVEs should just be referenced in the remaining content. <b style="color:#006699;">Ed Prevost</b> profile|contributions 13:32, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
 * I agree, it's too complicated, poorly unreferenced, and unnecessary. We can summarize and condense the web/CGI, SSH, and possibly DHCP examples, since those are being widely reported, but the last two are kinda just givens. (If we mention setuid is a problem, we'd have to mention it's an issue if a program is just running as root without being setuid, and other obvious stuff like that.) IRW0 (talk) 16:04, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
 * I've reworked it, please review. <b style="color:#006699;">Ed Prevost</b> profile|contributions 16:14, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
 * I disagree. The section needs to be expanded not condensed. Privilege escalation is a local vulnerability which exists independently and needs to be mentioned. It's not a given - supplying arbitrary environment variables shouldn't cause arbitrary code execution. There are known-dangerous environment variables (PATH, SHELLOPTS etc) but shellshocked makes **any** variable passed to a setuid binary dangerous, even previously "known harmless" ones, when they need not be and are not under e.g. dash or any other posix shell. Ben@liddicott.com (talk) 12:30, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
 * We already had consensus on this topic, previously. The general feel was that the section would have to list every potential conduit, and isn't really the scope of this article, perhaps there is a List of exploitation types that we could link to? But this int a list article. <b style="color:#006699;">Ed Prevost</b> profile|contributions 15:00, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
 * and I do not consent to this change, so clearly there is no actual consensus. I'm reverting those changes and following WP:BRD. Also, the idea of discussing something for a couple of hours and then claiming consensus is improper. Many editors only check in at wikipedia every other day of so or even less frequently. This is particularly the case for this article as many of us have been working OT on addressing this bug in real life, so please give everyone time to contribute to the discussion and actually obtain consensus before claiming consensus.  Sparkie82 ( t • c )  18:53, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
 * A full discussion of the exploitation vectors in that section is essential to this article. Readers need to be given a complete explanation of how the bug is exploited. To say that the section may get to big is not the as it "being" too big. I suggest we change the name of the section to Exploitation vectors, so editors don't try to expand it with a bunch of specific examples. Then I suggest subsectioning it into broad categories like; offline exploits, web services, and other application layer exploits. (We can discuss the exact subsections.) Then within each of those subsections there can be explanations of how the various types of exploits work.  Sparkie82  ( t • c )  18:53, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I also agree too much was trimmed with the original change (and hoped some bits would've been fleshed back out more by now.) I'm opposed to the escalation of privilege and offline vulnerabilities, because they're too vague (would be WP:UNDUE without listing even more theoretical vulnerabilities) and possibly unreferenceable. I'm okay with having separate CGI/SSH/DHCP sections if we have sufficient text to flesh them out. IRW0 (talk) 20:16, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm still of the opinion that it would be better to start a list, or locate one and point to it from here, even if we pointed to sections of it. Otherwise it'll just be a big chunk of OR prose. <b style="color:#006699;">Ed Prevost</b> profile|contributions 20:56, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

I also thnk we need to cover notiable exploit vectors in this article, especially ones that have gotten repeated coverage along side articles about the active bug as well as ones that have been already exploited. This article is not just about the bug but the security implications of it, and as such it should cover the implications especially as readers that might not be security experts. That said we do not need to cover all; such a list would be impossibly long. PaleAqua (talk) 22:14, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
 * This is my point. Any listing should be verifiable and not a bunch of speculative OR... which is where the list is currently headed. <b style="color:#006699;">Ed Prevost</b> profile|contributions 15:14, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
 * "That said we do not need to cover all; such a list would be impossibly long." Prove it. listed three: CGI, SSH, and DHCP. Prove that a full list would be "impossibly long."  Sparkie82  ( t • c )  01:05, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I think what, and myself are saying is that an error such as this, at such a granular level within day-to-day operations, touches on hundreds of possible points of exploitation. I still think a separate list of verified paths is needed. So, as you asked, on a typical AWS EC2 instance, bash could interact with or from an invocation of:


 * cp
 * l.
 * ll
 * ls
 * mv
 * rm
 * which
 * alias
 * bg
 * bind
 * break
 * builtin
 * caller
 * cd
 * command
 * compgen
 * complete
 * compopt
 * continue
 * declare
 * dirs
 * disown
 * echo
 * enable
 * eval
 * exec
 * exit
 * export
 * false
 * fc
 * fg
 * getopts
 * hash
 * help
 * history
 * jobs
 * kill
 * let
 * local
 * logout
 * mapfile
 * popd
 * printf
 * pushd
 * pwd
 * read
 * readarray
 * readonly
 * return
 * set
 * shift
 * shopt
 * source
 * suspend
 * test
 * times
 * trap
 * true
 * type
 * typeset
 * ulimit
 * umask
 * unalias
 * unset
 * wait
 * if
 * then
 * else
 * elif
 * fi
 * case
 * esac
 * for
 * select
 * while
 * until
 * do
 * done
 * in
 * function
 * time
 * }
 * ]]
 * coproc
 * cp
 * l.
 * ll
 * ls
 * mv
 * rm
 * which
 * if
 * then
 * else
 * elif
 * fi
 * case
 * esac
 * for
 * select
 * while
 * until
 * do
 * done
 * in
 * function
 * time
 * }
 * ]]
 * coproc
 * alias
 * bg
 * bind
 * break
 * builtin
 * caller
 * cd
 * command
 * compgen
 * complete
 * compopt
 * continue
 * declare
 * dirs
 * disown
 * echo
 * enable
 * eval
 * exec
 * exit
 * export
 * false
 * fc
 * fg
 * getopts
 * hash
 * help
 * history
 * jobs
 * kill
 * let
 * local
 * logout
 * mapfile
 * popd
 * printf
 * pushd
 * pwd
 * read
 * readarray
 * readonly
 * return
 * set
 * shift
 * shopt
 * source
 * suspend
 * test
 * times
 * trap
 * true
 * type
 * typeset
 * ulimit
 * umask
 * unalias
 * unset
 * wait
 * findfs
 * vgscan
 * start_udev
 * audispd
 * halt
 * auditctl
 * telinit
 * e2undo
 * fsfreeze
 * wipefs
 * installkernel
 * vgrename
 * vgimportclone
 * insmod
 * vgcreate
 * service
 * lvmdump
 * sln
 * ipmaddr
 * install-info
 * lvmconf
 * lvresize
 * mkbootdisk
 * dmevent_tool
 * nologin
 * lvreduce
 * logsave
 * depmod
 * dumpe2fs
 * auditd
 * dump
 * vgreduce
 * restore
 * mkinitrd
 * bridge
 * faillock
 * rmt
 * cbq
 * mkfs.cramfs
 * pvck
 * fuser
 * chkconfig
 * lvs
 * restart
 * ldconfig
 * sysctl
 * switch_root
 * pwhistory_helper
 * rdisc
 * dmraid
 * kexec
 * mkswap
 * mkfs.ext4
 * ifdown
 * new-kernel-pkg
 * modprobe
 * ec2udev-vbd
 * cfdisk
 * reboot
 * blkid
 * accton
 * fsck.ext3
 * pvscan
 * e2fsck
 * sfdisk
 * vgexport
 * ausearch
 * dhclient
 * ip6tables
 * ether-wake
 * losetup
 * mii-diag
 * quotacheck
 * addpart
 * tc
 * clock
 * dmeventd
 * mkfs.ext2
 * restorecon
 * vgconvert
 * rdump
 * debugfs
 * fstrim
 * ifenslave
 * udevd
 * modinfo
 * ifcfg
 * vgmknodes
 * mke2fs
 * fsck.ext4
 * chcpu
 * swapon
 * lvremove
 * pivot_root
 * ppp-watch
 * lsmod
 * ifup
 * pam_timestamp_check
 * resize2fs
 * init
 * blkdeactivate
 * pvcreate
 * rtmon
 * killall5
 * shutdown
 * lvscan
 * pvremove
 * fsck.ext2
 * cryptsetup
 * lsinitrd
 * plipconfig
 * partx
 * fsck.cramfs
 * ip
 * mkfs
 * swapoff
 * ip6tables-restore
 * badblocks
 * dmraid.static
 * vgremove
 * cgconfigparser
 * autrace
 * initctl
 * pvs
 * aureport
 * xtables-multi
 * grubby
 * rsyslogd
 * iptables-save
 * ctrlaltdel
 * consoletype
 * sulogin
 * lvmchange
 * ethtool
 * kdump
 * mdadm
 * rtpr
 * e2image
 * vgsplit
 * securetty
 * routef
 * dm_dso_reg_tool
 * lvcreate
 * blkdiscard
 * route
 * rmmod
 * pidof
 * pvmove
 * ifconfig
 * fdisk
 * delpart
 * pam_tally2
 * lvextend
 * rrestore
 * dhclient-script
 * pvchange
 * unix_update
 * unix_chkpwd
 * lvmsar
 * pvresize
 * vgextend
 * kpartx
 * tune2fs
 * lvmetad
 * lvdisplay
 * slattach
 * fsck
 * vgcfgrestore
 * vmcore-dmesg
 * cgrulesengd
 * status
 * blockdev
 * agetty
 * mingetty
 * sgpio
 * reload
 * genhostid
 * iptables
 * arp
 * lvmdiskscan
 * fixfiles
 * e2label
 * vgcfgbackup
 * mii-tool
 * dracut
 * mkfs.ext3
 * fstab-decode
 * sushell
 * weak-modules
 * mkdumprd
 * start
 * udevsettle
 * iptunnel
 * setsysfont
 * hwclock
 * mkhomedir_helper
 * netreport
 * vgs
 * MAKEDEV
 * poweroff
 * ec2udev-vcpu
 * runuser
 * busybox
 * runlevel
 * lvrename
 * nameif
 * stop
 * lvmsadc
 * quotaoff
 * setfiles
 * routel
 * vgchange
 * udevadm
 * load_policy
 * setkey
 * pam_console_apply
 * vgimport
 * cgclear
 * ip6tables-save
 * fsadm
 * mdmon
 * change_console
 * mgetty
 * getkey
 * lvconvert
 * dmsetup
 * arping
 * iptables-restore
 * quotaon
 * lvchange
 * vgck
 * augenrules
 * vgdisplay
 * lvm
 * pvdisplay
 * vgmerge
 * false
 * cp
 * iptables-xml
 * ksh
 * cpio
 * dbus-uuidgen
 * gettext
 * netstat
 * lscgroup
 * awk
 * mount
 * dmesg
 * unicode_stop
 * gawk
 * cut
 * findmnt
 * date
 * bash
 * egrep
 * lsblk
 * ln
 * dbus-monitor
 * dbus-cleanup-sockets
 * df
 * cgget
 * touch
 * dd
 * ls
 * chown
 * rview
 * mountpoint
 * umount
 * vi
 * chgrp
 * loadkeys
 * nano
 * cgexec
 * gunzip
 * rnano
 * cat
 * lssubsys
 * cgclassify
 * sh
 * ipcalc
 * sed
 * zcat
 * rmdir
 * basename
 * mknod
 * pwd
 * ping6
 * csh
 * dbus-daemon
 * gzip
 * ping
 * usleep
 * cgset
 * dbus-send
 * ex
 * fgrep
 * ypdomainname
 * env
 * red
 * rm
 * mailx
 * ps
 * domainname
 * raw
 * tar
 * mktemp
 * dnsdomainname
 * arch
 * find
 * cgcreate
 * cgsnapshot
 * su
 * taskset
 * unicode_start
 * echo
 * mail
 * tracepath
 * rvi
 * setfont
 * nice
 * tracepath6
 * view
 * kill
 * traceroute
 * mkdir
 * dumpkeys
 * unlink
 * rpm
 * cgdelete
 * ed
 * grep
 * uname
 * nisdomainname
 * login
 * sort
 * chmod
 * tcsh
 * stty
 * hostname
 * more
 * link
 * traceroute6
 * readlink
 * mv
 * sync
 * setserial
 * kbd_mode
 * true
 * gtar
 * ksh93
 * dash
 * sleep
 * rtcwake
 * ntpdc
 * tcpdmatch
 * ctstat
 * addgnupghome
 * run_init
 * tcpdump
 * adduser
 * tickadj
 * raid-check
 * insmod
 * mkfs.minix
 * racoonctl
 * ss
 * rdistd
 * ntpdate
 * rngd
 * zic
 * update-motd
 * thin_restore
 * rtstat
 * fsck.minix
 * usernetctl
 * getsebool
 * depmod
 * e4defrag
 * zdump
 * nstat
 * update-alternatives
 * authconfig-tui
 * makedumpfile
 * sshd-keygen
 * fdformat
 * cache_check
 * filefrag
 * crond
 * cache_repair
 * yum-updatesd
 * capsh
 * ntp-keygen
 * ntpd
 * iconvconfig.i686
 * groupmems
 * faillock
 * iconvconfig
 * tcpd
 * httpd
 * anacron
 * pwhistory_helper
 * lchage
 * hardlink
 * yum-complete-transaction
 * modprobe
 * cracklib-check
 * swaplabel
 * useradd
 * luseradd
 * praliases
 * logrotate
 * accton
 * conmand
 * ldattach
 * acpid
 * e2freefrag
 * cc_dump
 * saslpasswd2
 * pwck
 * racoon
 * usermod
 * chroot
 * arpd
 * t1libconfig
 * matchpathcon
 * setenforce
 * thin_check
 * restorecon
 * ping6
 * chpasswd
 * iptstate
 * pluginviewer
 * newusers
 * genhomedircon
 * seunshare
 * modinfo
 * rotatelogs
 * create-cracklib-dict
 * htcacheclean
 * lsof
 * lsmod
 * ntpq
 * pam_timestamp_check
 * setsebool
 * irqbalance
 * vipw
 * sntp
 * httpd.worker
 * sys-unconfig
 * grpunconv
 * krb5-send-pr
 * sendmail.sendmail
 * pwunconv
 * ntsysv
 * groupdel
 * testsaslauthd
 * thin_metadata_size
 * uuserver
 * lnstat
 * readprofile
 * quotastats
 * convertquota
 * setcap
 * cache_dump
 * glibc_post_upgrade.i686
 * avcstat
 * cacertdir_rehash
 * packer
 * togglesebool
 * vigr
 * getenforce
 * gss-server
 * resizepart
 * httpd.event
 * sulogin
 * thin_rmap
 * ethtool
 * visudo
 * lgroupdel
 * sa
 * suexec
 * cc_test
 * grpck
 * accessdb
 * mklost+found
 * plainrsa-gen
 * ifstat
 * cracklib-format
 * rmmod
 * yumdb
 * semodule
 * userdel
 * selinuxdefcon
 * tracepath
 * tcpslice
 * pam_tally2
 * cracklib-packer
 * callback
 * unix_update
 * tracepath6
 * unix_chkpwd
 * build-locale-archive
 * httxt2dbm
 * apachectl
 * getcap
 * mksock
 * selinuxexeccon
 * dump-acct
 * sestatus
 * open_init_pty
 * grpconv
 * thin_repair
 * mkdict
 * sshd
 * groupmod
 * fixfiles
 * applygnupgdefaults
 * repquota
 * genl
 * weak-modules
 * makemap
 * groupadd
 * saslauthd
 * smrsh
 * sendmail
 * edquota
 * thin_dump
 * hwclock
 * mkhomedir_helper
 * sserver
 * ntptime
 * lpasswd
 * getpcaps
 * tmpwatch
 * safe_finger
 * setquota
 * mailstats
 * try-from
 * selinuxconlist
 * rtacct
 * pwconv
 * luserdel
 * ccreds_chkpwd
 * sasldblistusers2
 * lid
 * setfiles
 * selinuxenabled
 * lusermod
 * load_policy
 * pam_console_apply
 * authconfig
 * cracklib-unpacker
 * clockdiff
 * quota_nld
 * rpc.rquotad
 * arping
 * cache_restore
 * sim_server
 * lgroupadd
 * atd
 * lgroupmod
 * lnewusers
 * dump-utmp
 * atrun
 * alternatives
 * strace-log-merge
 * gss-client
 * grap2graph
 * callgrind_annotate
 * intltoolize
 * cg_annotate
 * kibitz
 * prlimit
 * mysql
 * linux64
 * symlinks
 * aulast
 * clean-binary-files
 * msgattrib
 * find-jar
 * gzexe
 * vdir
 * pr
 * rsync
 * mkpasswd
 * whiptail
 * fipscheck
 * openssl
 * yum-config-manager
 * head
 * ksu
 * klist
 * elbadmin
 * msgfmt
 * ipcmk
 * ruby
 * rpmspec
 * sqlite3
 * gettext
 * semodule_deps
 * eu-stack
 * troff
 * eu-size
 * glib-compile-schemas
 * cvsbug
 * cheetah
 * tfmtodit
 * dislocate
 * xzgrep
 * db_dump
 * setleds
 * ltrace
 * awk
 * mysql_secure_installation
 * pygmentize
 * pre-grohtml
 * uuidgen
 * autoheader
 * setmetamode
 * ptargrep
 * gcore
 * cc
 * grolbp
 * tzselect
 * cfadmin
 * pod2usage
 * gpic
 * sdbadmin
 * ftp-rfc
 * gawk
 * c++filt
 * repo-graph
 * eu-ranlib
 * nohup
 * rdistd
 * editdiff
 * build-jar-repository
 * setup-nsssysinit
 * kill_instance
 * lua
 * podselect
 * whereis
 * makedb
 * h2xs
 * db_upgrade
 * instmodsh
 * bzcmp
 * id
 * rlogin-cwd
 * callgrind_control
 * znew
 * h2ph
 * split
 * pgawk
 * build-classpath
 * getkeycodes
 * numastat
 * timed-run
 * luac
 * latrace-ctl
 * mysqld_multi
 * diff-jars
 * flex++
 * checkmodule
 * xzmore
 * gdb-add-index
 * lchsh
 * pdfroff
 * semodule_expand
 * cut
 * infotocap
 * dwp
 * markdown_py
 * tput
 * lzfgrep
 * bzgrep
 * svnrdump
 * nail
 * cscope-indexer
 * mmd
 * bzip2
 * sha384hmac
 * g32pbm
 * gpg-zip
 * lzdiff
 * htdbm
 * whatis
 * as
 * psfstriptable
 * chage
 * chacl
 * tail
 * ipcs
 * fsfs-reorg
 * grefer
 * ssh-keyscan
 * policytool6
 * espdiff
 * eu-strip
 * gfortran
 * pgrep
 * cpanp
 * sechecker
 * pinentry
 * apropos
 * conman
 * setarch
 * podchecker
 * semodule_unpackage
 * msginit
 * myisam_ftdump
 * stat
 * eqn
 * dynamodb_load
 * compile_et
 * stapsh
 * kswitch
 * lss3
 * lzmainfo
 * mpartition
 * mdeltree
 * pl2pm
 * cmsutil
 * getent
 * gsoelim
 * xzcat
 * tr
 * gcov48
 * perlthanks
 * aclocal
 * swig
 * bzless
 * build-classpath-directory
 * show-installed
 * renice
 * info
 * psfxtable
 * sftp
 * rebuild-jar-repository
 * zegrep
 * free
 * a2p
 * ldd
 * mysql_zap
 * sudoreplay
 * resolve_stack_dump
 * gmake
 * instance_events
 * grolj4
 * fsfs-access-map
 * preconv
 * replace
 * resolveip
 * svnadmin
 * fc-cat
 * sha256hmac
 * rpmverify
 * grodvi
 * repodiff
 * gettext.sh
 * slabtop
 * byacc
 * tclsh
 * sclient
 * dbiproxy
 * mountpoint
 * update-mime-database
 * expand
 * pod2texi
 * rev
 * zipsplit
 * autoscan
 * db_recover
 * rmid
 * hostid
 * soelim
 * killall
 * sotruss
 * nsupdate
 * fipshmac
 * sha256sum
 * ac
 * groups
 * setfattr
 * ranlib
 * lwp-download
 * rmid6
 * svnversion
 * zipdetails
 * showkey
 * seq
 * erb
 * purgestat
 * uuclient
 * slogin
 * rediff
 * yum
 * bzdiff
 * batch
 * tty
 * python2.6
 * zforce
 * vimdiff
 * s3put
 * msgcmp
 * ktutil
 * svnserve
 * pod2man
 * script
 * weather
 * reset
 * objdump
 * pic
 * getopt
 * innochecksum
 * s2p
 * printenv
 * gettextize
 * lexgrog
 * fc-query
 * setfacl
 * xargs
 * zipcloak
 * nano
 * my_print_defaults
 * htpasswd
 * shasum
 * stdbuf
 * oldrdist
 * pyrsa-sign
 * pstack
 * cloud-init-per
 * envsubst
 * eu-elflint
 * sha384sum
 * eu-unstrip
 * mesg
 * cytune
 * prtstat
 * rmail
 * gdiffmk
 * expect
 * erb1.8
 * sha1sum
 * pkill
 * bison
 * lwp-request
 * dtrace
 * lddlibc4
 * lchfn
 * semodule_link
 * ld.bfd
 * cheetah-compile
 * gneqn
 * cq
 * lsattr
 * nroff
 * pstree
 * skill
 * fc-cache
 * cmp
 * ld.gold
 * zless
 * ccache-swig
 * xmlcatalog
 * isohybrid
 * mrd
 * ms_print
 * gunzip
 * flex
 * migratepages
 * sprof
 * eu-ar
 * ipcrm
 * nc
 * rnano
 * rdist
 * lkbib
 * dbus-binding-tool
 * json_pp
 * mkhybrid
 * stap
 * mysqlbinlog
 * eu-make-debug-archive
 * gindxbib
 * nm
 * recode-sr-latin
 * libtoolize
 * lzless
 * timed-read
 * yum-debug-dump
 * gcc48-ranlib
 * unpack200
 * intltool-update
 * which
 * xzcmp
 * xmllint
 * msggrep
 * mtools
 * mysql_fix_extensions
 * mcomp
 * rpm2cpio
 * c++48
 * uniq
 * resizecons
 * unxz
 * git-upload-archive
 * eject
 * zipinfo
 * mysqladmin
 * latrace
 * debuginfo-install
 * gencat
 * recountdiff
 * autoupdate
 * rebuild-security-providers
 * run-parts
 * get_module
 * timeout
 * rftp
 * numfmt
 * asadmin
 * pod2html
 * db_dump185
 * lookbib
 * perl5.16.3
 * gpgconf
 * mailq.sendmail
 * cpan2dist
 * pack200
 * xkibitz
 * ruby1.8
 * zcat
 * mysqlhotcopy
 * mysql_upgrade
 * cloud-init-cfg
 * mkfifo
 * mysql_convert_table_format
 * python
 * lzcat
 * pkg-config
 * i686-amazon-linux-gcc-4.8.2
 * eqn2graph
 * unbuffer
 * pstruct
 * ssh-copy-id
 * gethostip
 * rngtest
 * show-changed-rco
 * zipgrep
 * catman
 * mysqldump
 * gnroff
 * update-ca-trust
 * urlgrabber
 * svn
 * zipnote
 * sha512sum
 * isodebug
 * getfattr
 * stap-report
 * fetch_file
 * gtroff
 * xz
 * find2perl
 * xxd
 * memhog
 * gpg-error
 * zcmp
 * test
 * tac
 * mapscrn
 * psed
 * strace
 * migspeed
 * strip
 * geqn
 * pack2006
 * post-grohtml
 * nsenter
 * mkmanifest
 * xzegrep
 * rcsmerge
 * mysqlshow
 * linux32
 * autoexpect
 * libnetcfg
 * orbd
 * gcov
 * setsid
 * gcc48
 * dbiprof
 * rpmdb
 * gzip
 * ptardiff
 * c++
 * ctags
 * intltool-merge
 * bunzip2
 * lex
 * tbl
 * mcopy
 * yes
 * unshare
 * isodump
 * chfn
 * write
 * GET
 * dc
 * lzmore
 * pod2latex
 * perlbug
 * mcat
 * getfacl
 * isosize
 * cscope
 * yum-groups-manager
 * tgz
 * valgrind
 * addr2line
 * vmstat
 * yum-debug-restore
 * perror
 * git-upload-pack
 * keytool
 * svnlook
 * java6
 * pyrsa-encrypt-bigfile
 * cwutil
 * numactl
 * infokey
 * rpmquery
 * peekfd
 * ci
 * gpg-agent
 * mdel
 * lzcmp
 * repotrack
 * nl
 * gdbus
 * mysql_config
 * comm
 * uptime
 * shred
 * hexdump
 * ex
 * svn-bench
 * objcopy
 * manpath
 * findcon
 * gpg-zip2
 * newgrp
 * logname
 * i686-amazon-linux-c++48
 * mshowfat
 * prove
 * dig
 * reposync
 * rpmbuild
 * taskadmin
 * lzgrep
 * chrt
 * passmass
 * phar
 * gcc48-c89
 * refer
 * psfaddtable
 * corelist
 * time
 * env
 * join
 * autopoint
 * fold
 * less
 * lslocks
 * htdigest
 * setterm
 * at
 * lesspipe.sh
 * gcc48-ar
 * rpmkeys
 * launch_instance
 * attr
 * repo-rss
 * lsdiff
 * phar.phar
 * memdiskfind
 * sha512hmac
 * sesearch
 * atrm
 * unpack2006
 * pmap
 * hpftodit
 * db_archive
 * combinediff
 * modutil
 * rcs
 * gcc48-nm
 * pwmake
 * who
 * ntpstat
 * msgmerge
 * fgconsole
 * db_deadlock
 * tic
 * pwscore
 * automake-1.13
 * gpasswd
 * msgexec
 * mxtar
 * flipdiff
 * replcon
 * cvs
 * ssh-keygen
 * mcheck
 * dbilogstrip
 * sum
 * xsltproc
 * msql2mysql
 * rcsclean
 * git-shell
 * md5sum
 * mysql_setpermission
 * vgdb
 * gcc48-c99
 * sediff
 * passwd
 * minfo
 * cksum
 * grn
 * kdestroy
 * valgrind-listener
 * gtbl
 * sudo
 * patch
 * svnsync
 * unexpand
 * staprun
 * gsettings
 * newaliases.sendmail
 * diffstat
 * list_instances
 * hoststat
 * db_stat
 * chvt
 * servertool
 * factor
 * mmount
 * glacier
 * numademo
 * mzip
 * install
 * msgconv
 * rename
 * berkeley_db_svc
 * g3cat
 * snice
 * g++48
 * vim
 * signtool
 * paste
 * rmiregistry6
 * Mail
 * aulastlog
 * mailq
 * splitdiff
 * orbd6
 * curl
 * pax
 * pwdx
 * eu-readelf
 * lpunlock
 * find
 * glookbib
 * pyami_sendmail
 * ssltap
 * lessecho
 * merge
 * loadunimap
 * rcsfreeze
 * pitchplay
 * deallocvt
 * php-cgi
 * readelf
 * mysqlbug
 * i686-amazon-linux-gcc48
 * kpasswd
 * tailf
 * zip
 * secon
 * bzip2recover
 * bashbug-32
 * db_checkpoint
 * python2
 * open
 * msguniq
 * php
 * tee
 * wall
 * autom4te
 * pldd
 * libtool
 * getconf
 * repoclosure
 * grops
 * semodule_package
 * look
 * showconsolefont
 * file
 * flock
 * pathchk
 * m4
 * indexcon
 * stap-prep
 * xsubpp
 * mlabel
 * ausyscall
 * cloud-init
 * intltool-prepare
 * yacc
 * doxygen
 * i386
 * eu-findtextrel
 * tload
 * tabs
 * tnameserv
 * gpgsplit
 * myisampack
 * pystache
 * procmail
 * db_load
 * mysqlimport
 * mysql_tzinfo_to_sql
 * sedismod
 * easy_install
 * gstack
 * catchsegv
 * get_reference_source
 * mformat
 * idn
 * zfgrep
 * afs5log
 * cpan
 * mcookie
 * stapdyn
 * logresolve
 * wget
 * indxbib
 * setkeycodes
 * sudoedit
 * gendiff
 * col
 * mdir
 * funzip
 * eu-elfcmp
 * utmpdump
 * keytool6
 * i686-amazon-linux-g++48
 * interdiff
 * xzdec
 * ssh-agent
 * column
 * certutil
 * mysqlcheck
 * printf
 * truncate
 * gpgv
 * aclocal-1.13
 * quota
 * find-repos-of-install
 * krb5-config
 * zdiff
 * expr
 * route53
 * grotty
 * gpg
 * xmlwf
 * db_codegen
 * servertool6
 * msgunfmt
 * cpanp-run-perl
 * od
 * msgen
 * gdb
 * bzcat
 * gprof
 * crontab
 * du
 * mysqld_safe
 * pic2graph
 * myisamchk
 * fc-scan
 * perldoc
 * unwrapdiff
 * mdu
 * xzless
 * kill
 * zsoelim
 * bzmore
 * needs-restarting
 * fc-list
 * tnameserv6
 * msgfilter
 * ident
 * base64
 * xzdiff
 * watchgnupg
 * conmen
 * mailstat
 * clear
 * db_printlog
 * pyrsa-decrypt-bigfile
 * genisoimage
 * gpgparsemail
 * gpg2
 * autoreconf
 * mysql_install_db
 * lz
 * lzegrep
 * ab
 * mysqltest
 * f95
 * check-binary-files
 * indent
 * easy_install-2.6
 * lzmadec
 * ifnames
 * mysqlslap
 * iconv
 * eu-addr2line
 * mattrib
 * git
 * pk12util
 * intltool-extract
 * mclasserase
 * host
 * uz
 * quotasync
 * cheetah-analyze
 * wdctl
 * rcs2log
 * checkpolicy
 * gpgsplit2
 * mysqlaccess
 * cg_merge
 * lesskey
 * kvno
 * chcon
 * markdown_py-2.6
 * msgcomm
 * db_verify
 * texi2any
 * diff3
 * pyrsa-keygen
 * repoquery
 * ssh
 * ssh-add
 * eu-nm
 * captoinfo
 * auvirt
 * seinfo
 * zmore
 * co
 * jvmjar
 * size
 * dircolors
 * kbdrate
 * fsfs-stats
 * formail
 * mysql_waitpid
 * rhino
 * newaliases
 * gpg-connect-agent
 * setpriv
 * stap-merge
 * mren
 * lwp-dump
 * sdiff
 * ptx
 * lscpu
 * mbadblocks
 * isoinfo
 * g++
 * lwp-mirror
 * sg
 * makeinfo
 * tclsh8.5
 * piconv
 * eu-strings
 * colrm
 * neqn
 * signver
 * colcrt
 * bundle_image
 * ocs
 * atq
 * makemap
 * unzipsfx
 * rpcgen
 * amuFormat.sh
 * kmod
 * yumdownloader
 * scp
 * ul
 * p11-kit
 * w
 * ar
 * infocmp
 * oldfind
 * perl
 * localedef
 * i686-amazon-linux-gfortran48
 * myisamlog
 * gpgv2
 * verifytree
 * xgettext
 * setup-nsssysinit.sh
 * cpp
 * locale
 * pyrsa-priv2pub
 * rmail.sendmail
 * dehtmldiff
 * systool
 * xzfgrep
 * readmult
 * automake
 * chattr
 * cal
 * acpi_listen
 * c89
 * fixcvsdiff
 * fmt
 * diff
 * users
 * isovfy
 * tmpwatch
 * eu-objdump
 * svndumpfilter
 * rcsdiff
 * phpize
 * lzma
 * strings
 * java
 * vimtutor
 * make
 * pystache-test
 * pydoc2
 * pydoc2.6
 * mcd
 * pinky
 * realpath
 * svnauthz
 * lastlog
 * c99
 * gcc
 * mysqldumpslow
 * dirname
 * nproc
 * pstree.x11
 * unzip
 * HEAD
 * pinentry-curses
 * package-cleanup
 * filterdiff
 * ionice
 * crash
 * perlivp
 * readlink
 * python26
 * elfedit
 * pyrsa-decrypt
 * kinit
 * repomanage
 * man
 * fallocate
 * rmiregistry
 * mysql_fix_privilege_tables
 * cpp48
 * igawk
 * rvim
 * pyrsa-encrypt
 * tsort
 * psfgettable
 * openvt
 * create-jar-links
 * last
 * unlzma
 * pod2text
 * kadmin
 * valgrind-di-server
 * sha224sum
 * lastcomm
 * runcon
 * fc-match
 * crlutil
 * toe
 * ptar
 * pydoc
 * msghack
 * syslinux
 * mtoolstest
 * lockfile
 * csplit
 * config_data
 * yum-builddep
 * shuf
 * testrb1.8
 * sedispol
 * dir
 * ld
 * logger
 * bc
 * db_hotbackup
 * watch
 * mturk
 * groff
 * tset
 * wc
 * POST
 * addftinfo
 * dynamodb_dump
 * pyrsa-verify
 * mysql_find_rows
 * cg_diff
 * mandb
 * grepdiff
 * c2ph
 * namei
 * mmove
 * chsh
 * pfbtops
 * splain
 * testrb
 * k5srvutil
 * mtype
 * ngettext
 * gfortran48
 * whoami
 * lastb
 * sha1hmac
 * aserver
 * gio-querymodules-32
 * zgrep
 * git-receive-pack
 * sim_client
 * top
 * rlog
 * scriptreplay
 * autoconf
 * nslookup
 * msgcat
 * mkisofs
 * rds-create-db-snapshot
 * iam-instanceprofiledel
 * elb-create-lb
 * iam-instanceprofilelistbypath
 * iam-userlistcerts
 * ec2-cancel-export-task
 * ec2-reset-snapshot-attribute
 * ec2-describe-instance-status
 * ec2cim
 * ec2-delete-route-table
 * rds-describe-orderable-db-instance-options
 * ec2dnicatt
 * as-describe-auto-scaling-groups
 * ec2-describe-vpc-attribute
 * iam-grouplistusers
 * ec2dvpc
 * ec2-create-route
 * ec2rnicatt
 * ec2rsnapatt
 * ec2udi
 * iam-userdelcert
 * iam-servercertupload
 * as-create-or-update-tags
 * iam-grouplistbypath
 * ec2dxt
 * ec2-describe-spot-price-history
 * ec2csir
 * mon-cmd
 * ec2-detach-volume
 * rds-create-option-group
 * ec2-create-snapshot
 * ec2-revoke
 * ec2dsnapatt
 * ec2gpass
 * ec2-describe-account-attributes
 * ec2-create-reserved-instances-listing
 * ec2-run-instances
 * ec2-resume-import
 * ec2-create-vpc
 * iam-userenablemfadevice
 * mon-describe-alarms
 * elb-describe-instance-health
 * as-exit-standby
 * elb-delete-lb-listeners
 * ec2-create-vpc-peering-connection
 * ec2-delete-bundle
 * rds-remove-option-from-option-group
 * ec2-describe-conversion-tasks
 * ec2-describe-network-interfaces
 * ec2-bundle-instance
 * ec2-migrate-manifest
 * elb-delete-lb
 * ec2detvol
 * mon-set-alarm-state
 * ec2rinatt
 * ec2-delete-disk-image
 * ec2apcx
 * ec2dinatt
 * ec2-describe-group
 * ec2mri
 * rds-add-source-identifier-to-subscription
 * ec2cxt
 * ec2reboot
 * ec2dpgrp
 * ec2-delete-vpn-connection-route
 * rds-restore-db-instance-from-db-snapshot
 * mon-delete-alarms
 * ec2datt
 * ec2-describe-availability-zones
 * ec2minatt
 * ec2-delete-subnet
 * ec2dvs
 * ec2digw
 * rds-delete-option-group
 * rds-modify-db-subnet-group
 * rds-create-db-security-group
 * rds
 * ec2-create-keypair
 * ec2-modify-vpc-attribute
 * iam-groupaddpolicy
 * rds-delete-db-instance
 * elb-create-lb-policy
 * ec2drim
 * ec2-delete-network-acl
 * iam-servercertgetattributes
 * rds-describe-db-log-files
 * elb-detach-lb-from-subnets
 * as-version
 * as-describe-adjustment-types
 * ec2-purchase-reserved-instances-offering
 * ec2-associate-dhcp-options
 * ec2-disassociate-route-table
 * ec2dsnap
 * cfn-elect-cmd-leader
 * ec2attigw
 * rds-authorize-db-security-group-ingress
 * ec2cbun
 * as-describe-termination-policy-types
 * rds-describe-db-parameter-groups
 * ec2-download-bundle
 * ec2reladdr
 * ec2delvpn
 * iam-usermodloginprofile
 * ec2-create-vpn-gateway
 * ec2addvol
 * ec2-delete-dhcp-options
 * ec2apip
 * ec2addsnap
 * rds-promote-read-replica
 * ec2attvgw
 * ec2delnae
 * ec2fp
 * ec2dimatt
 * ec2-create-vpn-connection-route
 * ec2-attach-volume
 * as-describe-policies
 * ec2ivol
 * rds-describe-events
 * iam-userdelloginprofile
 * ec2-create-subnet
 * ec2ddopt
 * ec2dri
 * ec2-accept-vpc-peering-connection
 * ec2addnacl
 * ec2daz
 * iam-roledelpolicy
 * ec2-create-customer-gateway
 * ec2-reboot-instances
 * iam-roleaddpolicy
 * ec2-modify-volume-attribute
 * ses-verify-email-address.pl
 * as-delete-notification-configuration
 * iam-instanceprofileaddrole
 * iam-usergetloginprofile
 * rds-describe-db-parameters
 * ec2-create-group
 * ec2addsds
 * ec2deldopt
 * iam-useraddloginprofile
 * ec2-delete-vpc
 * ec2dbun
 * iam-accountgetpasswordpolicy
 * ec2-copy-snapshot
 * as-cmd
 * ec2-describe-vpc-peering-connections
 * ec2-describe-reserved-instances-listings
 * ec2-describe-addresses
 * ec2auth
 * ec2-attach-network-interface
 * iam-groupcreate
 * ec2-delete-spot-datafeed-subscription
 * ec2delvol
 * ec2dvol
 * cfn-send-cmd-result
 * ec2assocdopt
 * ec2assocrtb
 * ec2-describe-vpcs
 * ec2-delete-network-interface
 * rds-create-db-instance-read-replica
 * ec2-create-vpn-connection
 * ec2-reset-image-attribute
 * ec2addtag
 * ec2-modify-reserved-instances
 * ec2upip
 * elb-set-lb-policies-of-listener
 * ec2erp
 * mon-list-metrics
 * iam-useraddkey
 * ses-get-stats.pl
 * iam-roleupdateassumepolicy
 * ec2delsubnet
 * as-suspend-processes
 * as-record-lifecycle-action-heartbeat
 * iam-usermodkey
 * ec2dvolatt
 * ec2drtb
 * ec2delpcx
 * ec2-create-tags
 * iam-usermodcert
 * ec2-describe-reserved-instances
 * as-delete-lifecycle-hook
 * ec2-enable-volume-io
 * ec2detigw
 * ec2-describe-tags
 * ec2-attach-internet-gateway
 * ec2assocaddr
 * iam-rolelistpolicies
 * as-delete-policy
 * ec2-modify-image-attribute
 * ec2-describe-dhcp-options
 * elb-delete-lb-policy
 * as-describe-tags
 * iam-instanceprofileremoverole
 * ec2-import-volume
 * ec2-delete-internet-gateway
 * rds-delete-db-subnet-group
 * ec2-add-keypair
 * ec2ikey
 * ec2-describe-keypairs
 * iam-userlistmfadevices
 * as-resume-processes
 * iam-usercreate
 * ec2evio
 * as-create-launch-config
 * iam-accountaliascreate
 * ec2attnic
 * ec2-migrate-image
 * ec2-authorize
 * ec2mimatt
 * ec2-modify-network-interface-attribute
 * ec2-create-internet-gateway
 * iam-rolecreate
 * elb-modify-lb-attributes
 * ec2actlic
 * ec2-unassign-private-ip-addresses
 * ec2-confirm-product-instance
 * ec2dnic
 * elb-disassociate-route53-hosted-zone
 * iam-userdeactivatemfadevice
 * ec2-import-keypair
 * rds-add-option-to-option-group
 * ec2revoke
 * ec2disaddr
 * iam-usergetattributes
 * mon-disable-alarm-actions
 * rds-version
 * ec2-add-group
 * ec2diatt
 * ec2repnaclassoc
 * iam-rolegetattributes
 * ec2daddr
 * rds-describe-option-groups
 * ec2cvcr
 * ec2-request-spot-instances
 * ec2-report-instance-status
 * elb-enable-zones-for-lb
 * ec2reprt
 * ec2-activate-license
 * ec2dvpn
 * iam-roleuploadpolicy
 * ec2gcons
 * ec2ratt
 * ec2-describe-customer-gateways
 * rds-create-db-instance
 * ec2iv
 * rds-describe-db-security-groups
 * elb-version
 * ec2-unmonitor-instances
 * ec2-create-volume
 * ec2-disassociate-address
 * cfn-hup
 * ec2-ami-tools-version
 * ec2tag
 * rds-create-db-parameter-group
 * iam-useruploadpolicy
 * ec2-describe-spot-datafeed-subscription
 * as-update-auto-scaling-group
 * ec2-create-placement-group
 * iam-virtualmfadevicedel
 * ec2deactlic
 * ec2-modify-instance-attribute
 * rds-download-db-logfile
 * iam-useraddpolicy
 * rds-add-tag-to-resource
 * ec2-cancel-spot-instance-requests
 * ec2kill
 * ec2-disable-vgw-route-propagation
 * ec2-detach-internet-gateway
 * ec2-delete-vpn-gateway
 * ec2ver
 * cfn-send-cmd-event
 * ec2drp
 * rds-describe-db-snapshots
 * ec2-create-network-acl-entry
 * iam-grouplistpolicies
 * as-put-lifecycle-hook
 * as-describe-account-limits
 * ses-setup-notifications.pl
 * ec2delvpc
 * ec2msubnetatt
 * ec2cpsnap
 * ec2dsph
 * rds-list-tags-for-resource
 * iam-accountdelpasswordpolicy
 * mon-describe-alarms-for-metric
 * ec2addgrp
 * ec2addrtb
 * ec2-version
 * ec2drio
 * elb-disable-zones-for-lb
 * ec2-bundle-image
 * ec2-replace-network-acl-association
 * ec2detnic
 * iam-instanceprofilegetattributes
 * ec2-stop-instances
 * as-enable-metrics-collection
 * ec2dim
 * ec2addkey
 * iam-accountgetsummary
 * as-disable-metrics-collection
 * iam-userdelkey
 * ec2-describe-regions
 * iam-instanceprofilelistforrole
 * rds-describe-db-subnet-groups
 * ec2deltag
 * ec2-terminate-instances
 * ec2rim
 * elb-attach-lb-to-subnets
 * as-describe-launch-configs
 * rds-purchase-reserved-db-instances-offering
 * as-set-instance-health
 * ec2-assign-private-ip-addresses
 * ec2dlic
 * ec2-create-dhcp-options
 * mon-describe-alarm-history
 * ec2-unbundle
 * ec2dpcx
 * ec2delsnap
 * ec2-monitor-instances
 * ec2rsi
 * rds-modify-db-instance
 * elb-create-lb-listeners
 * elb-apply-security-groups-to-lb
 * ec2allocaddr
 * iam-instanceprofilecreate
 * iam-virtualmfadevicecreate
 * ec2-create-network-interface
 * ec2-delete-vpn-connection
 * rds-restore-db-instance-to-point-in-time
 * rds-reboot-db-instance
 * ec2delgrp
 * ec2-delete-keypair
 * ec2dril
 * iam-virtualmfadevicelist
 * as-describe-scheduled-actions
 * ec2-allocate-address
 * ec2ii
 * iam-servercertmod
 * ec2-attach-vpn-gateway
 * ec2-cancel-bundle-task
 * rds-describe-reserved-db-instances
 * ec2dvcr
 * ec2-describe-vpn-connections
 * ec2-create-instance-export-task
 * as-describe-notification-configurations
 * elb-create-lb-cookie-stickiness-policy
 * rds-remove-tags-from-resource
 * iam-userlistkeys
 * rds-describe-reserved-db-instances-offerings
 * ec2delnic
 * ec2-describe-placement-groups
 * ec2dsubnet
 * iam-userlistgroups
 * ec2rpcx
 * elb-configure-healthcheck
 * rds-update-option-in-option-group
 * elb-set-lb-policies-for-backend-server
 * ec2addigw
 * iam-groupdel
 * ec2riatt
 * iam-userlistpolicies
 * elb-describe-lbs
 * ec2matt
 * iam-userchangepassword
 * as-execute-policy
 * ses-verify-identity.pl
 * elb-deregister-instances-from-lb
 * as-put-notification-configuration
 * ec2-describe-export-tasks
 * ec2dtag
 * rds-describe-event-subscriptions
 * rds-modify-event-subscription
 * ec2reprtbassoc
 * ec2dva
 * ec2addpcx
 * iam-groupuploadpolicy
 * as-describe-auto-scaling-notification-types
 * iam-roledel
 * ec2deligw
 * rds-revoke-db-security-group-ingress
 * ec2-delete-vpc-peering-connection
 * iam-groupremoveuser
 * iam-rolelistbypath
 * ec2-delete-placement-group
 * ec2addixt
 * ec2cct
 * ec2delrtb
 * ec2-associate-route-table
 * ec2-start-instances
 * ec2dre
 * ec2-describe-licenses
 * ec2-create-route-table
 * rds-describe-option-group-options
 * ec2dcgw
 * as-put-scaling-policy
 * ec2daa
 * ec2-delete-group
 * ec2start
 * ec2min
 * rds-modify-db-parameter-group
 * ec2dereg
 * iam-accountaliasdelete
 * ec2-describe-vpn-gateways
 * ec2dvgw
 * ec2iin
 * ec2-get-password
 * ec2mvolatt
 * rds-describe-db-engine-versions
 * ec2mim
 * ec2-cmd
 * ec2dgrp
 * iam-accountaliaslist
 * ec2-describe-spot-instance-requests
 * ec2-modify-subnet-attribute
 * rds-watch-db-logfile
 * as-put-scheduled-update-group-action
 * ec2-metadata
 * as-describe-scaling-activities
 * ec2cpi
 * ec2-reject-vpc-peering-connection
 * iam-groupmod
 * ec2miatt
 * ec2-get-console-output
 * ec2bundle
 * ec2-bundle-vol
 * ec2-describe-network-interface-attribute
 * as-describe-lifecycle-hook-types
 * rds-create-event-subscription
 * ec2addsubnet
 * cfn-signal
 * rds-delete-event-subscription
 * as-describe-lifecycle-hooks
 * ec2-delete-snapshot
 * ec2-reset-instance-attribute
 * ec2dins
 * as-create-auto-scaling-group
 * ec2delkey
 * ec2-delete-tags
 * iam-groupdelpolicy
 * ec2-describe-bundle-tasks
 * ec2msnapatt
 * ec2-describe-image-attribute
 * mon-version
 * iam-useraddcert
 * as-enter-standby
 * rds-describe-db-instances
 * ec2-replace-network-acl-entry
 * rds-delete-db-parameter-group
 * elb-cmd
 * rds-reset-db-parameter-group
 * ec2dct
 * iam-userlistbypath
 * iam-servercertlistbypath
 * ec2-describe-route-tables
 * ec2-deactivate-license
 * ec2-cancel-reserved-instances-listing
 * ec2delnacl
 * ec2-modify-snapshot-attribute
 * ec2-associate-address
 * rds-delete-db-security-group
 * ec2-release-address
 * elb-associate-route53-hosted-zone
 * ec2-detach-network-interface
 * ec2addcgw
 * mon-put-metric-alarm
 * ec2-migrate-bundle
 * ec2din
 * ec2-delete-route
 * as-complete-lifecycle-action
 * cfn-get-metadata
 * elb-create-app-cookie-stickiness-policy
 * ec2rimatt
 * iam-usermod
 * ec2-delete-volume
 * ec2-describe-volume-status
 * ec2delcgw
 * ec2-create-network-acl
 * as-describe-metric-collection-types
 * as-delete-scheduled-action
 * ec2run
 * ec2addrt
 * ses-send-email.pl
 * ec2-replace-route
 * ec2-deregister
 * ec2reg
 * ec2addvpn
 * ec2cpimg
 * ec2addvgw
 * ec2delpgrp
 * ec2rep
 * ec2-create-spot-datafeed-subscription
 * ec2mnicatt
 * ec2-describe-snapshots
 * ec2-reset-network-interface-attribute
 * ec2-delete-customer-gateway
 * as-delete-tags
 * mon-enable-alarm-actions
 * ec2-import-instance
 * ec2addvpc
 * ec2-create-image
 * iam-userdelpolicy
 * ec2-replace-route-table-association
 * mon-get-stats
 * ec2-describe-volume-attribute
 * ec2delvgw
 * ec2detvgw
 * ec2dkey
 * ec2-upload-bundle
 * rds-delete-db-snapshot
 * iam-servercertdel
 * ec2delsds
 * ec2-delete-network-acl-entry
 * ec2addnae
 * ec2delrt
 * ec2-upload-disk-image
 * ec2-register
 * elb-set-lb-listener-ssl-cert
 * as-delete-launch-config
 * ec2stop
 * ec2mva
 * as-delete-auto-scaling-group
 * elb-describe-lb-policy-types
 * elb-register-instances-with-lb
 * ec2-describe-snapshot-attribute
 * as-describe-process-types
 * rds-copy-db-snapshot
 * ec2-describe-subnets
 * ec2crril
 * ec2-enable-vgw-route-propagation
 * ec2-detach-vpn-gateway
 * ec2-describe-instance-attribute
 * as-detach-instances
 * rds-describe-engine-default-parameters
 * ec2-describe-internet-gateways
 * ec2addpgrp
 * as-attach-instances
 * ec2ddi
 * ec2umin
 * ec2caril
 * ec2-describe-reserved-instances-offerings
 * ec2attvol
 * elb-describe-lb-policies
 * ec2-describe-reserved-instances-modifications
 * iam-accountmodpasswordpolicy
 * ec2-describe-network-acls
 * rds-remove-source-identifier-from-subscription
 * ec2dnacl
 * as-describe-auto-scaling-instances
 * rds-describe-event-categories
 * ec2adddopt
 * ec2-cancel-conversion-task
 * ec2-describe-images
 * iam-userresyncmfadevice
 * ec2prio
 * ec2repnae
 * ec2-copy-image
 * iam-userdel
 * iam-groupadduser
 * as-terminate-instance-in-auto-scaling-group
 * mon-put-data
 * elb-describe-lb-attributes
 * cfn-init
 * as-set-desired-capacity
 * ec2dsir
 * ec2addnic
 * ec2-describe-volumes
 * rds-create-db-subnet-group
 * ses-setup-dkim.pl
 * ec2-fingerprint-key
 * ec2-describe-instances
 * ec2disrtb
 * ec2dsds
 * mon-put-data
 * elb-describe-lb-attributes
 * cfn-init
 * as-set-desired-capacity
 * ec2dsir
 * ec2addnic
 * ec2-describe-volumes
 * rds-create-db-subnet-group
 * ses-setup-dkim.pl
 * ec2-fingerprint-key
 * ec2-describe-instances
 * ec2disrtb
 * ec2dsds

Albeit, it's not infinite, but perhaps that was simply an expression. <b style="color:#006699;">Ed Prevost</b> profile|contributions 01:57, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Very funny. Do you have reliable, verifiable sources for each one of thoses. :)
 * I guess we could have included the entire text of the King James Bible in that list; after all, an exploit could use any of the words within the string arguments of commands. Seriously, I think it's just a matter of defining how the attack vectors are categorized. The ones from above: CGI, DHCP, and SSH are common standards/protocols -- a subset of a much smaller list. So, how should the subsections be categorized?  Sparkie82 ( t • c )  04:36, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Sadly, that you replied this way leads me to believe you fail to understand the potential attacks concerning "thoses", and are not willing to do due diligence to remedy that knowledge debt. This topic is longer about coming to an understanding, together as editors, but is simply you tantruming, until you get your way. Again, I submit we either direct to some exhaustive list and then add specific gritty details as a known attack becomes public, or we just continue to list attacks as they become public; addressing each and every possible attack path, without verifiable resources, is speculation, original research, and in my opinion "adding article text, just to say you did". <b style="color:#006699;">Ed Prevost</b> profile|contributions 15:10, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

We don't need reliable sources for things we are not going to include in the article. <b style="color:Sienna">Chillum</b> 15:31, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
 * OpnVPN PoC http://pastebin.com/VyMs3rRd — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edprevost (talk • contribs) 21:43, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
 * @Cillum, if you are referring to that long list of commands above, I agree, thus the smiley face.  Sparkie82 ( t • c )  17:25, 4 October 2014 (UTC)


 * I think I need to explain something here that I thought was already understood. For purposes of this explanation only, here is a general diagram of an attack using Shellshock.


 * Attacker → crafts a value for an environment variable containing malicious command(s) → uses a mechanism to introduce the bad data into a system → the value gets assigned to a variable →the variable gets exported to an instance of Bash → Bash executes the malicious command(s) → bad things start happening


 * The scope of the article section that we are discussing here, “exploit vectors”, covers the steps from where the bad data has been crafted, to the point where Bash executes the malicious command(s). Of course all the possibilities of what happens after the malicious command(s) execute are way beyond the scope of this article. Just as the motivations of the attacker are of no concern. I thought that was understood, but I guess not.


 * This section just needs to fully explain the types of vectors that could be used to get the the malicious code into a system and executed by Bash.


 * An additional note about instances of specific breaches. This section is about how the bug is exploited, not about incidents of security breaches. There could be another section listing specific incidents, but this section is not about that.  Sparkie82 ( t • c )  17:25, 4 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Again, I think you fail to understand "uses a mechanism to introduce the bad data into a system". The list I provided is a dump of every function or command that bash has reach to and from... meaning, if you could find access to, for example, a cp command call, either through an application or script or otherwise, you could in theory perform 6271. <b style="color:#006699;">Ed Prevost</b> profile|contributions 17:42, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Ed, nobody but you is suggesting that we categorize the exploit vectors by command or system call. I suggested using broad categories. What I am hearing you say is "No, we shouldn't use broad categories, I think it should be categorized very finely, at the command or system call level, and oh, by the way, if we do that then the list is too long so let's get rid of the section all together." If that's what you are saying, it's absurd.  Sparkie82 ( t • c )  00:38, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
 * If that's what you're hearing, my apologies. Allow me to try and summarize again,, as you seem very eager to be 'published' here. All I'm saying is you're recommending a section that is basically 100% OR, and from a research perspective I would point out it needs to be all encompassing/exhaustive as possible for the vulnerabilities at hand. So even if you categorize it, there is still an open door created for adding a near infinite amount of OR content; and I would venture to guess this is some of the very reasoning behind the  policy. But alas, it's OR and shouldn't be here any way. If you're so eager to produce this OR content, why don't you write a column and submit it for editorial review at a publication? Or perhaps your own blog? Or maybe even a small softcover? I am very-much-so in favor of providing details on verifiable paths of exploitation, as reported and verified according to policy, but I'm not at all interested in satiating your desire to just plop your speculative thoughts on the subject here. That being said, i'm very open to any clarification, if i'm not understanding you correctly.  <b style="color:#006699;">Ed Prevost</b> profile|contributions 03:06, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Ed, I reverted your last edit that moved unrelated content to the beginning of this talk page discussion because it violates WP:TPO. You may also want to (re)read WP:TPYES. This discussion is not about OR content, it's about whether of not to include the section on expoit vectors, and how to organize it. That being said, I think we have a consensus -- at least on the question of including details of the exploit vectors in the article, since you just said, "I am very-much-so in favor of providing details on verifiable paths of exploitation..." Of course, any editor, if she feels that incorrect information is being presented in the article may challenge that content by requesting a source. The exploit vector section is no exception to that WP process. So, beyond just cutting content you "don't like", how do you suggest that we present the details on exploit vectors in this section?  Sparkie82 ( t • c )  23:03, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for clarifying on the moving of the section... however it was moved in its entirety and is very much so related to this discussion, but as you protest such a move I've added a note to this section. As for your question my reply is the same, add only what we have good verifiable references for; not your friends blogs and twitter accounts and forum posts. I really think said it best when we previously discussed this: "...removing all of the original research and having a smaller encyclopedia as a result would be a dramatic improvement. Quality of content is more important than quantity."  <b style="color:#006699;">Ed Prevost</b> profile|contributions 01:03, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I once again reverted changes you make to previous comments in this discussion thread and I've placed a warning on your talk page. That older discussion has nothing to do with this discussion. It was over when you started this thread. In fact, the section under discussion in that thread (Log parsing) was no longer in the article when this thread started. Please do not edit previous comments to change meaning; and follow WP:TPO and WP:TPYES when editing in talk pages.  Sparkie82 ( t • c )  03:21, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

PLEASE READ the previous discussion on the "logging" entry, which was removed from the "exploit" section due to the very issue of OR in this section that I am trying to avoid again. That previous discussion is most pertainent to discussions about the parent exploit section. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Shellshock_(software_bug)#Section_.22Log_parsing.22 <b style="color:#006699;">Ed Prevost</b> profile|contributions 05:02, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Well, I started that discussion, reread it, and posted a closing remark to it, but thanks for reminding me just one more time.  Sparkie82 ( t • c )  05:11, 10 October 2014 (UTC)


 * I guess we're done here; no consensus.  Sparkie82 ( t • c )  05:11, 10 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Regarding the removal of material you "don't like", you may want to (re)read WP:NOCITE.  Sparkie82 ( t • c )  05:11, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Updated NIST Information Now Available?
FWIW -- Following have been *very recently* registered (data possibly useful in the article?): Following were registered earlier - but also recently updated: In any case - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 13:25, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
 * CVE-2014-6278 - 20140930nist
 * CVE-2014-7186 - 20140929nist
 * CVE-2014-7187 - 20140929nist
 * CVE-2014-6271 - 20140924nist
 * CVE-2014-6277 - 20140927nist
 * CVE-2014-7169 - 20140924nist
 * OK, I will gladly check! - gacelperfinian&#40;talk in &#45; error&#63; Start [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gacelperfinian&action=edit a new topic] &#41; 13:32, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Vandalism
hi i'm not an admin

this bash(1) vulnerability is total bull

the premise is that a user cannot run bash to create a file using special quoting

the history of shells in general is that syntax (especially quoting, piping) is difficult to get correct AND different between competing shells, and that parsing might be flawed or cause something one didn't first expect. documentation focused on getting it right. whatever happens: it was limited to impacting the user running it. it's not suid.

there was never any concept that one might "abuse every part of sh(1) to find a parse error that allowed user to create a file owned by user". infact flaws are taken advantage of at times and called features and or compatibility!

again total non-sense. the proper perspective is: it cannot allow user to become another user. if user can run flawed software that creates a file: is not a security issue.

it's "an update" maybe but not a security issue. and one that may be targeted at causing old scripts to fail (that has YET to be seen as T/F)

so when are you fixing zsh(1), csh(1), ksh(1) for "parse flaws" huh? i thought so. total bull.

SUMMARY 1: under no circumstances would one allow users to pass args to a root owned shell (only an idiot would think that could ever be secure old unix docs told you so)

SUMMARY 2: under no circumstances would one allow foreigners to pass args to a user COMMAND shell and expect user account not to eventually be hacked by a, guess what, COMMAND. never.

EVEN WITH 1 FIX it'd stupid to think there was no other parsing trick that might be found. and old unix docs / linux docs told you so.

ONLY ONLY user should run "well known" applications (checking crc before using, of course) and expect failure in rare cases

UNIX SECURITY: no shell run as user can become root, no running process owne by user can become root (unless it's suid - which is reserved for legally feduciary software who's purpose is to manage the same barrier. otherwise a suid binary is likely a crafted virus in waiting, or could become one)

SOFTWARE SECURITY: if you value your user account don't run crappy software and of course don't let foreigners provide input to any software. don't put anything in an online user account you value greatly and always back up.

it's just as they always told you.

the idea this new fellow has found a flow unix gurus hadn't known about: IS FALSE ADVERTISEMENT - AIMED AT MAKING UNIX / LINUX LOOK BAD

any apple or microsoft or android, if it allowed user to allow foreigners to provide ANY input to ABOUT ANY running software expecting input ... any number of flaws will be found that could effect user and or create a file owned by user

....

you people sometimes i want to throw a shoe at these things 72.219.202.186 (talk) 16:47, 2 October 2014 (UTC)


 * You do understand that this allows a form of command injection that was not expected prior to the discovery of the bug? You can become another user by fooling a program running as another user. Bash, DHCP and a bunch of other core utilities in unix/linux had serious faults that when added up allowed some very serious exploitation. <b style="color:Sienna">Chillum</b> 17:02, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

1980's advice
in 1980's IBM release to pubilc not to trust keyboards made in china

today hardware is very complex made of many components. infact some components are made so that government or police can evesdrop or hack consumer computers (ie, DOCIS modems)

circuits are very large and complex and what might be hidden in them to be (accidentally) invoked - it's too complex for most anyone to know

the fact is if one is using ANY large complex system produces by many foreigners around the world one should EXPECT there are hidden triggers waiting in the hardware. and moreso the software - that circle is even more bribe-able and loosely watched.

72.219.202.186 (talk) 16:47, 2 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Are you suggesting that a foreigner put that bash bug there on purpose? If so then this is not the appropriate forum for your theories. <b style="color:Sienna">Chillum</b> 17:03, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Wheeler's timeline, and Stephane speaks
From the list 2014-10-03 15:28:31 -0400, David A. Wheeler: > FYI, I've created a timeline of major Shellshock events here: > >  http://www.dwheeler.com/essays/shellshock.html#timeline > > If anyone has corrections or key additions, let me know. [...]

About the discovery.

I discovered it in the morning (UK) of 2014-09-12 and reported it at Fri, 12 Sep 2014 16:10:35 +0100 to Chet, and the security contacts of Debian, Red Hat, Ubuntu and Mandriva (SUSE added later) including details of the bug and the SSH and HTTP (Apache header) vectors and mitigation and a bit fat warning that it was very serious and not to be disclosed.

First patch by Chet at 2014-09-12 16:32:17 -0400, but was easily bypassed. Ensued a discussion on that original list, several patch iterations, whether or not to harden at this point and how, whether or not to output error messages on parsing error, additional vectors, scope, detection methods (IDS...), other affected shells, local privilege escalation?, whether localisation can bypass the fix, the impact of two env vars with the same name, backward compatibility, who to contact early... Of course, I have no visibility of what was discussed internally at Red Hat/Ubuntu/Mandriva...

I suggested the name "bashdoor" on that list on Sun, 14 Sep 2014 14:29:48 +0100.

A release schedule with public disclosure on the 24th at 14:00 UTC and early notification to other unix and linux vendors on the 22nd and select infrastructure provider notification (such as CDNs including Microsoft) on the 23rd proposed on the 16th by Florian.

Chet had patches for the final (before disclosure) fix for the current and all past versions of bash up to 3.0 by 2014-09-16 22:00:02 -0400 (from diff dates)

I was out of the loop after the 19th

bashdoor.com was registered (not by me) with a creation date of 2014-09-24 13:59 UTC sometime before 2014-09-24 06:59:10Z according to whois. Florian also said here that someone brought the early notification sent to vendors/infrastructure to the press, so someone obviously intended to take it to the press. I don't know whom.

To answer the other post. The feature was definitely not in 1.05 nor 1.12 (the source of which can be found on the web), but was in 1.13.5. Chet confirmed (to me and news outlets) that it was added in 1.13.

Cheers, Stephane
 * Further communication on the mailing lists by both Stephane and Chet has confirmed that the bug was present in 1.13, but that it was pre-existing even at that time, introduced by Brian Fox in August 1989 rather than Chet Ramey in 1992. The reason that the quoted email incorrectly suspected that 1.5 was not vulnerable is because it is so difficult to locate versions of bash earlier than 1.13 to actually confirm differences between versions. Ericblake (talk) 22:45, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Is Shellshock really a security bug in bash?
The idea of a security bug in a program that allows users to destroy files strikes me as silly. No shell, including bash, was ever originally intended to be executed indirectly by someone who had the ability to manipulate environment variable values. Arguably, the CGI mechanism that allows that is the security issue.

I think characterizing Shellshock as security bug in bash is misleading at best. It's certainly a bug in bash - but what makes the whole thing a security bug is the CGI mechanism, which is utilized only a small percentage of systems that have bash. I suggest the introduction be more clear about this.

The perception out there bash has a security bug is confusing people. They think using bash, in any way, makes them vulnerable. --В²C ☎ 01:18, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
 * It's far more than a bug that can be exploited via CGI. The article lists other areas such as restricted shell bypass. --Oscarthecat (talk) 08:54, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
 * That's a bug in the restricted shell. --В²C ☎ 17:31, 9 October 2014 (UTC)


 * There is a bug. The bug is a security issue. The bug is in bash. There is a security bug in bash. Bash is an environment that commands run in, it does not simply mean a command prompt for a user to type anything into. The fact that SSH can be forced to run a command but will put your original command in an environment variable seems to contradict your theory that bash was not intended to be executed indirectly by someone who had the ability to manipulate environment variable values. <b style="color:Sienna">Chillum</b> 09:16, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The ForceCommand feature of SSH is a feature of SSH, and has nothing to do with bash per se. Shells existed long before remote logins were invented, much less the SSH ForceCommand feature. Again, bash was never intended to be secure - so to say it has a security bug is nonsensical.  It's like saying there is a security breach on a public beach.  --В²C ☎ 17:31, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Bash has a bug that can be exploited in environments that are meant to be secure and use bash - but bash itself does not have a security bug. --В²C ☎ 17:34, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Going round in circles here. bash offers security in the form of its "-r" switch, which offers a restricted shell.  Due to a security bug in bash it is possible to bypass the restrictions of the bash "restricted shell" feature. --Oscarthecat (talk) 19:11, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

It is very simple. Bash executes codes that it is not supposed to execute. It fails to properly escape user input allowing an injection attack. This is a security vulnerability in bash by any objective measure. Bash is not behaving as it is supposed to and this is causing severe security issues. The suggestion that bash is not meant to be used in secure environments is contradicted by decades of actual security practice.

I don't mean to be rude but your position seems to lack a basis. <b style="color:Sienna">Chillum</b> 20:19, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
 * If you try to have a private discussion on the beach, and your measures fail because it turns out the sand dunes on the beach bounce sound around in a way that enables others far away to hear your whispers, are you going to say the beach has a security issue? The point is: why would you expect to the beach to be secure?  Same with bash. All I'm trying to say is that there is nothing inherently insecure in using bash in how it is normally used, even if it has this bug in it.  Only if you are trying to use bash in a particular way — with the -r option or to execute scripts in a secure environment but in which the environment variables can be manipulated — is there a potential issue.  --В²C ☎ 21:07, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

I am glad that you recognize the issue. Your remaining argument seems to be that bash is not meant to be used in secure environments where users can define environment variables, this is not supported by general practice. <b style="color:Sienna">Chillum</b> 21:43, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I never said "bash is not meant to be used in secure environments where users can define environment variables", nor anything that means that. Bash is a tool - it is not a security tool. The following is a valid bash command.  It will remove many if not all files on a system (depending on relevant user/directory permissions).

rm -rf /
 * Any program that allows that is not a security tool! To say that such an inherently insecure program has a security bug is ridiculous because it implies it's supposed to be secure, which it's not (excepting restricted mode).   --В²C ☎ 00:35, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Nobody anywhere disputes that Bash is designed to execute arbitrary commands from its controlling terminal, its script input, or its command line. The function export mechanism, however, exists to pass definitions, not immediate commands, across a process boundary. Because Bash did not limit the export namespace and did not validate the definitions, immediate command execution was not only possible but staggeringly easy. This was careless, astonishing and dangerous. CGI, by contrast, defines a variable namespace. The Bash behavior has been acknowledged as a security bug by the program's mantainer, by several high-profile computer security experts and by the major Linux distributors. 50.185.134.48 (talk) 06:17, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Security tools are not the only tools that may have security issues. Any tool that unnecessarily opens a system to attack is a tool that has security issues. But anyway, it doesn't matter what Wikipedia editors say; what do reputable sources say? —174.141.182.82 (talk) 15:02, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

I know that it was considered a security issue, because many CGI scripts invoke some bash scripts to produce an output, and there is nothing wrong with that on its own. It allows writing some servers easily, and if proper care is taken for input sanitization it works just fine. It is not that the environmental variables are inherited, or that they should contain values only, and they were not properly parsed, because Bash's PROMPT_COMMAND environmental variable by design allows to run arbitrary commands. The main problem with Shellshock is that when using CGI, all the input headers and URL data are put into HTTP_xyz, QUERY_STRING and PATH_INFO environmental variables. And that is fine too, becasue it is not possible to put stuff into PROMPT_COMMAND for example, and all HTTP servers will ensure that other environment variables are sane (i.e. PS1, or LANG, or HOME, BASH_ENV, etc, and some of these are even ignored when run in 'privileged' mode using bash -p), and there is no direct way to add new or modify existing variables other than the HTTP_xyz ones, which are not going to conflict with any existing variable used by shell. The expectation, and the design of environment variables, is that they just carry some strings, and if they are not used by the shell in any particular way, they shall remain just strings, and not interpreted in any specific way. Bash violated this behavior with this bug. How the bash did had a bug like this is absolutely beyond me.2A02:168:F609:0:DA58:D7FF:0:F02 (talk) 19:57, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

bug fix broke bash
The Background section currently has this statement:
 * Function definitions are exported by encoding them within the environment variable list as variables whose values begin with parentheses ("") followed by a function definition.

I think the "fix" for Shellshock has broken this. You used to be able to do this:

$ x = ' {echo in x;}' $ x in x $

That no longer works in versions of bash with the Shellshock fix.

--В²C ☎ 01:07, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm using bash 4.2.45 (released 7th March 2013 ), which precedes all the Shellshock patching. Using that version of bash, the code you've written behaves as below.
 * $ echo $BASH_VERSION
 * 4.2.45(1)-release
 * $ x = ' {echo in x;}'
 * $ -bash: x: command not found


 * Using a fairly recent version of bash, 4.3.28(2) (released 1st October 2014 ), I see the same (consistent) behaviour.
 * $ echo $BASH_VERSION
 * 4.3.28(2)-release
 * $ x = ' {echo in x;}'
 * $ -bash: x: command not found


 * On which version of bash were you seeing the behaviour you're concerned with? --Oscarthecat (talk) 11:32, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm going from memory. Maybe I'm wrong.  Never mind unless I can recreate.  Sorry!  --В²C ☎ 16:36, 10 October 2014 (UTC)


 * You're relying on undocumented behavior. The documented way to export functions to a Bash instance is to use "export -f" within Bash. Bash has always handled the details of how to export the functions, which is why nobody thought about them for so long. As a result of the fix, it now handles the details differently. 50.185.134.48 (talk) 18:37, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Section title capitalization
Hey, ! I've just, so please allow me to explain it a bit further. While looking at MOS:SECTIONCAPS and MOS:LCITEMS, they both pretty much boil down to "the correct case should always be retained, even in situations where normal rules would require capitalization". At the same time, I'm not sure that "qmail" is a true registered trademark so MOS:TMRULES would apply? Am I missing something? &mdash; Dsimic (talk | contribs) 01:37, 6 November 2014 (UTC)


 * The guidelines apply even if the name is not registered. The rules actually boil down to the opposite of that quote. Sentence case typically overrides preferred styling. The quote you give above is related to mathematical notation and programming languages were case changes meaning and is not the general case The other exception is pretty much single letter lower case followed by uppercase, such as eBay, iPod. Everything else should have the first letter capitalized at beginning of sentence or section name. PaleAqua (talk) 03:10, 6 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Please let me reread those MOS sections. &mdash; Dsimic (talk | contribs) 06:30, 6 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Sorry for my delayed response. You're right, and I was wrong.  Thus, I've ; however, having "Qmail" is still plain weird to me. &mdash; Dsimic (talk | contribs) 01:03, 9 November 2014 (UTC)


 * No worries. To be honest, it's a weird to me as well, but it's what the guidelines specify. I wonder if the wording could be tweaked so the section header doesn't begin with the name qmail. That would avoid the issue. PaleAqua (talk) 04:51, 9 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Hm, it could be tweaked for sure, but that would unnecessarily complicate the section title. In addition, I've seen this capitalization issue in section titles and sentences numerous times in a large number or articles.  That makes me wonder whether it would make sense to adjust the guidelines, so that "the correct case should always be retained" is extended beyond mathematical notation and programming languages?  I know, it's simply against the English grammar, but that's how we got "disk" as a new word, for example. :) &mdash; Dsimic (talk | contribs) 05:58, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Who is Stéphane Chazelas?
Stéphane Chazelas contacted Bash's maintainer...

The name Stéphane Chazelas is introduced without any mention of who he is. Is his name relevant? If so, he should be described in some way, even if it is just "a Unix user". (He is apparently not important enough to have his own Wikipedia entry.) &mdash; 91.238.123.116 (talk) 11:57, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Better example for CVE-2014-7169?
The escaped characters, "\166\165\154\156\145\162\141\142\154\145" is ASCII for "vulnerable".

The dollar substitution converts the backslashes to ASCII, but if we escape the dollar:

On a vulnerable system:

On a non vulnerable system, it will simply output $\166\165\154\156\145\162\141\142\154\145 instead of date.

Husseydevin (talk) 17:20, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Dead source - "http://www.futuresouth.us/wordpress/?p=5" [20]
The following source is dead. But I found the site in the Wayback archive.

I found the following guide to fix it, but the given template doesn't feel right in the preview - I have no idea how to fix it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Using_the_Wayback_Machine

Dead Source: http://www.futuresouth.us/wordpress/?p=5 [20]

Wayback machine: http://wayback.archive.org/web/20160328232448/http://www.futuresouth.us/wordpress/?p=5

Thank you for your help DopeforHope (talk) 10:59, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Recent huge hack releasing 2 TB of data from Cayman National Bank and Trust
This hack was done using this vulnerability. Considering how massive this hack was, it could be a good idea to include this in the "Reports of Attacks" section Skyturnrouge (talk) 06:02, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Dead source for reference name "businessweek"
The link for the BusinessWeek citation (http://www.businessweek.com/news/2014-09-30/shellshock-draws-hacker-attacks-sparks-race-to-patch-bug) is dead.

I found a mirror on Bloomberg (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-09-30/shellshock-draws-hacker-attacks-sparks-race-to-patch-bug), but I do not know how to edit a citation. Could someone more knowledgeable than me with Wikipedia source editing please fix it? Lplawlor (talk) 23:34, 7 October 2022 (UTC)