Talk:Shemanski Fountain/Archive 1

GAN
I am nominating this article for Good article status. I have also requested a copy edit from the Guild of Copy Editors; ideally, the copy edit would take place before the GA nomination begins. One oddity about this article is that it includes two infoboxes. This is because the fountain is actually two separate works, designed by different individuals and installed separately. They also happen to be administered by different organizations. That being said, there is not enough information to warrant separate articles and most people view the two works as a single entity... Shemanski Fountain. I have tried to make this clear in the article. Any feedback is appreciated, and much thanks to the reviewer(s). -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:28, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Update: GA and GOCE reviews completed. Thank you, both, for your assistance. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 05:20, 4 September 2013 (UTC)