Talk:Shenton Way MRT station/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Juxlos (talk · contribs) 04:10, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

I will review this. Please provide 2-3 days in order to read through.
 * 1) Is it well written?
 * A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
 * "constructed as part of TEL3" - I get what this means, but is there a long form? Such as "TEL Phase 3", or something? TEL3 could mean phase 3, or maybe Singapore has 3 separate eastwards line that are all named TEL.
 * "Shenton Way station serves the TEL" - this feels off. The station, I assume, serves the surrounding areas and is served by the train service (TEL), but I wouldn't word it as is.
 * "Shenton Way station features two artworks" - in lead and in the body, I feel like this should be somewhat reworded. This implies that it features just two artworks - but for all we know, it has more that simply have not been added. You can say "station features the artworks Stride [...] and Everyday [...]", for example.
 * Not a hard-written requirement, but to reduce monotony, you think you can substitute "the station" here and there with something else? ("It" and "Shenton Way station" comes to mind)
 * B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
 * 1) Is it verifiable with no original research?
 * A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
 * Please be consistent on whether you use a linked, full name of the publisher (Land Transport Authority, Singapore Land Authority) or an abbreviated/raw unlinked one (LTA, CNA, mot.gov.sg) in your references.
 * Also probably classify the publisher= and work= value a bit separately. I wouldn't say the Singapore Land Authority is a news outlet.
 * Citations no 3, 4, and 8 can probably get their titles cleaned up
 * B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons&mdash;science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
 * C. It contains no original research:
 * D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
 * Earwig flagged several long-ish phrases and half-sentences, but I do not believe there is much merit in changing them.
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
 * B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each: I will be impressed if an article about a transit station can be non-neutral, but anyways, no POV.
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * Everything CC-BY-SA, and Singapore has FoP for buildings.
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall: First pass review complete. Have a look. Juxlos (talk) 16:25, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
 * On your corrections, there are only two forms of public artwork in the station. Rectified others. ZKang123 (talk) 06:43, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Please check again regarding the references. The same issues are still there.
 * On the public artworks, is there a better way to word it? Even at least adding "public" there would help. I would even argue putting the "two artworks" is not necessary - just directly go to naming the artworks one at a time. Juxlos (talk) 09:23, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Alright did so. Overlooked the comment on citations. My apologies ZKang123 (talk) 11:08, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Passing. Juxlos (talk) 07:19, 2 February 2023 (UTC)