Talk:Sherbrooke Forest

National Park article
I have just been working on the Dandynong National Park article which contains the Sherbrooke Forest and it strikes me that this stub could be moved to be a paragraph within the Dandynong Nat Park article. Any opinions or objections? Titus Vespasian (talk) 07:55, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi Karl - no objections to your suggestion; it is a good idea as long as the different parts of DRNP are distinguished in the article, as they have separate histories - e.g. Sherbrooke's place in early lyrebird research. Go for the merge - though you should probably go through the usual process (see: WP:Merge) and add merge tags first to alert any others interested.Maias (talk) 11:12, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I think it is easier to find if it remains a separate article. I went looking for Sherbrooke forest and found it easily. So if you merge it, you will need to leave some means of finding it - I don't know how that works. Why bother with the move anyway? The Dandenong article points to here very adequately. Patche99z (talk) 11:13, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

clitmate?
what's the climate there, please? temperature-ranges (seasonal, daily), rain, air humidity, sun-shine-times? may be a section about that in the article? (and by the way I'd like to know the same for higher eucalyptus-regnans-woods?) thanks! HilmarHansWerner (talk) 04:54, 10 February 2020 (UTC)