Talk:Sherlock Holmes Baffled/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 13:25, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: None found

Linkrot: One dead link repaired. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 13:32, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * I made one minor copyedit.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Can we have ISNs for the books, please?
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I am going to pass this as GA status, but the artcile could be improved by adding ISBN numbers. –– Jezhotwells (talk)
 * Thanks very much! Will endeavour to add those ISBNs - might try putting the refs in template format as well. Bob talk 16:27, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I am going to pass this as GA status, but the artcile could be improved by adding ISBN numbers. –– Jezhotwells (talk)
 * Thanks very much! Will endeavour to add those ISBNs - might try putting the refs in template format as well. Bob talk 16:27, 11 July 2010 (UTC)