Talk:Sherman Jackson

Untitled
the third resurrection blog was inspired by and named after sherman jackson's recent book. it contains links to talks and articles of proj. jackson and tried to flesh out the implications of his work. it seems relevant.

Blogs are seldom appropriate for sources on Wikipedia. This plus the fact that you linkspammed this and one other blog to quite a few sites seems to me to disqualify it as good source material. Dipics 16:36, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

first, i don't get paid and I'm not selling a product so we really aren't talking about spam. secondly, what you think about putting a totally different blog on a totally different site isn't really relevant. it makes your removal seem like an ad hominem. The particular blog we are talking about is still very related to Sherman Jackson.

Check out Jackson's resume here. Very notable.Bless sins 22:22, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't know. I've never heard of him/her. Seems to lack secondary sources.--Sefringle 02:54, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Prof. Jackson is very important as a Muslim scholar. He's easily notable.

PROD contested and removed
Resume here (which is linked in the article) suggested easily notable as an academic. The sourcing could be better, and some inline citations would be good, but this is no PROD candidate. -- Boing!   said Zebedee  00:46, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
 * bah, found refs in 1 minute, hence no WP:Before. Accotink2  talk 22:04, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problem
This article has been reverted by a bot to as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 14:36, 10 December 2010 (UTC)