Talk:Sherrilyn Kenyon

Tags
I'm adding the,  , and  tags because this page sounds like a press release for the author. The article is littered with weasel words (ex. with a script expertly penned) and I don't see one citation or source here. Please remember when citing something that the sources are reliable and can be verified. --ImmortalGoddezz 21:43, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

I've removed the tages listed above. I rewrote the biography completely, with sources, and I think I've gotten all those pesky weasel words removed too. I hope this is a much better article now. Karanacs 20:11, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

--- It's seems to me that you did a good job Karanacs! 82.46.242.94 20:26, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Tone of page?
The page kind of reads like it's a personal website or a fan site. Can anyone change this so it's a bit more encyclopedia like? Tokyogirl79 (talk) 09:23, 6 October 2009 (UTC)Tokyogirl79

Concur a lot. This is essentially advertising copy. --81.157.231.68 (talk) 17:34, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * To be precise, it's advertising copy from her website, which is copyrighted. Dougweller (talk) 14:23, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

"Cited content"
Why are people reverting so hard to preserve content cited to an archived version of the author's personal website, much of which was added at the very inception of the article by an SPA who left it looking like this and never edited again? How much of what is in the current article – apart from the lawsuit material – is actually notable and sourced to an RS? And why are people reverting publication information from the author's personal site? Doesn't WP:ABOUTSELF apply for that? I'm confused. Folly Mox (talk) 03:32, 27 April 2023 (UTC)