Talk:Shift (Narnia)

Rewrite
I was going to just fix a citation neede, but decided to rewrite the article so that it followed the Narnia Character Example Article. It could probably use a good proof reading, and some areas are clearly in need of expansion, but I think all of the citations are in place, so expanding it should be easy. LloydSommerer 04:42, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Shift.jpg
Image:Shift.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 15:56, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Traditional?!
".... in keeping with the traditional Protestant identification of the Pope with Antichrist."

I think that somebody with a much better understanding of theology (and possibly a little less bias?) needs to have a go at re-writing that sentence. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.31.193.229 (talk) 19:45, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

This article is a mess
I was going to give it a quick fix, but it needs a complete do-over. Somebody someday is going to have the thankless task of going through all the C. S. Lewis-related articles and removing the uncited commentary written by people who thought Wikipedia was the place for their own literary essays. Then there's the citations...

—VeryRarelyStable 03:29, 23 August 2020 (UTC)