Talk:Shin Megami Tensei: Imagine/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: GamerPro64 (talk · contribs) 02:57, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

I wasn't going to review another Megami Tensei article due to how dense they can get in detail but due to backlogs I'll be looking into this pretty soon. GamerPro64 02:57, 7 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Lead
 * "Forming part of the Megami Tensei series," I'm not sure I understand what this means with the game forming part of the series.
 * Reworded, it's just meant to say it's an entry in the Megami Tensei series.--IDVtalk 11:16, 10 February 2017 (UTC)


 * "post-Cataclysm Tokyo" Is the "C" supposed to be capitalized?
 * So, within SMT1 and SMT2, the "end of the world" is called the Cataclysm, with a capital C. But yes, I think it's clearer to just use "post-apocalyptic", so I changed it to that.--IDVtalk 11:16, 10 February 2017 (UTC)


 * "Imagine originated as an attempt at developing an online version of Shin Megami Tensei: Nine for PCs after the original version's online version was cancelled." Maybe drop the "s" in "PCs".
 * Done.--IDVtalk 11:16, 10 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Gameplay
 * Neither of the sources in the last two sentences of the section mention the "Cathedral of Shadows". I take it "Kamikaze no Kan" is that place?
 * It's called the Jakyou no Yakata (邪教の館) in Japanese, which is mentioned in the Game Watch Impress ref. In English Megami Tensei releases, that location is called the Cathedral of Shadows.--IDVtalk 19:42, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Allright that's fine. GamerPro64  02:19, 12 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Synopsis
 * This section looks fine. GamerPro64  02:19, 12 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Development
 * Can't help but think the word "development" is used one too many times in the section, especially in the first paragraph.
 * Sorry for the delay, I'll take a look at this when I get home from work.--IDVtalk 11:44, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
 * What do you think of it now?--IDVtalk 18:09, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yeah that's good. GamerPro64  21:31, 18 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Release
 * This section is fine. GamerPro64  21:31, 18 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Reception
 * This section is fine. GamerPro64  20:24, 21 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Sources
 * The sourcing is done well, with all the sources being reliable and in-line.

Ok. After two weeks of looking into this, I am comfortable with passing this article. If anyone has problems with the article, they can always take it to GAR. GamerPro64 03:01, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Somehow missed this last message until now, but thank you.--IDVtalk 16:59, 23 February 2017 (UTC)