Talk:Shirley Sagawa

Notability
Selected source analysis: I don't identify two distinct reliable sources with significant coverage but we've got one (#10) and enough sprinkled around elsewhere to make deletion unlikely. ~Kvng (talk) 20:23, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) impressive but not WP:INDEPENDENT
 * 2) book review with some biographical details
 * 3) passing mentions
 * 4) arguably significant coverage
 * 5) registration required
 * 6) comprehensive but arguably not independent because subject is an alumn
 * 7) passing mention
 * 8) routine
 * 9) primary source
 * 10) significant coverage