Talk:ShoMMA

Page should be the same as ShoXC, it's the same show. Sportslogo (talk) 05:59, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
 * No, it's not. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.31.155.94 (talk) 08:15, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Actually, ShoXC should be formatted correctly to match current MMA events. Udar55 (talk) 17:58, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Why does this have to be the standard? It's not easy to read, why can't tables be the standard? Sportslogo (talk) 19:00, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I have to agree with Sportslogo, the current format this page is in really isn't conducive to quick perusing for results. Lots of text without any major breaks makes it difficult to really see what you're looking at unless you stop scrolling for a minute and really read where you are on the page.  Maybe I'm just lazy, but I think it could be made easier to read.  The ShoXC article isn't the pinnacle of cleanliness either, but it atleast seems clearer to see what you're glancing at.  Is this page truly an example of the standard the MMA wikiproject wants?  I'd like to hear from other MMA Wikiproject members to get an idea what you think about how this page looks and possibly some suggestions (or links to other articles as examples) to see what we can all agree on.  Dachknanddarice  ( T ‖ C ) 21:41, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Thank you, the tables make it a lot easier to read, I also added boxes to include (arena, location, gate, attendance). The majority of the amateur fighters also don't have flags of their country next to their name, where is the standard?

I just want to improve the site. The current pages lacks the following attendance, gate, and salaries (total payroll). I want to include that as well. Sportslogo (talk) 00:31, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Each event should have it's own page?
Shouldn't each of these events have it's own page? Why are these clumped together on one page? Separating them would also I think help with the reading problems mentioned in the above comments. Tuoppi gm (talk) 13:07, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Seconded. There is no reason to leave all of this on one page. --JY23 (talk) 03:26, 13 February 2011 (UTC)


 * I'd also agree, just so the UFC events doesn't dominate the Scheduled mixed martial arts events category =P(Justinsane15 (talk) 02:38, 15 February 2011 (UTC))


 * I have to be honest, I don't mind that these are all on the same page, because I believe the same thing is true of the ShoXC events page. What I would like to suggest (since no one weighed in on the page layout issue) is that we atleast set the titles of each event as; "Strikeforce Challengers 1", "Strikeforce Challengers 2", etc. etc. instead of using the dates of the events as the headers.  In fact, I'm willing to make this change right now unless anyone has any objections.  I'll allow the standard 48 hours for replies to this suggestion before making any changes.  Please let me know here what you think about my proposed change.   Dachknanddarice  ( T ‖ C ) 19:30, 4 March 2011 (UTC)


 * I actually would agree with the motion to move each event to a separate page as the page is getting huge. These are basically Strikeforce's version of UFC Fight Nights and each of those get their own individual pages. Also, it appears that Showtime has dropped the ShoMMA moniker, so now might be the right time to switch to "Strikeforce Challengers" individual pages.  Udar55 (talk) 23:37, 5 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Good job creating the new pages Udar55. However, its now up to us (the MMA Community here) to work on the fighter's pages and re-direct all their fights (in the body of the articles and in their MMA records) to the correct pages.(Justinsane15 (talk) 03:59, 10 March 2011 (UTC))

Strikeforce Challengers 15
There seems to be some minor edit warring about wether the Satoshi Ishii vs. Scott Lighty bout will be a Heavyweight or Light Heavyweight fight. According to Strikeforce.com, (Here: ), this fight will be contested at the 205 lb or Light Heavyweight division. Please discontinue editing this fight as a Heavyweight fight. Thank you. Dachknanddarice ( T ‖ C ) 16:23, 4 March 2011 (UTC)