Talk:Shore Line East/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Nazcheema (talk · contribs) 09:56, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Starting the review
Hi, all. I will commence this second review soon. Thank you. Regards,  Naz &#124;  talk  &#124;  contribs  09:56, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Full review criteria checks
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for the six good article criteria:


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose is clear and concise, without spelling or grammar errors:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead (e.g., limit of four paragraphs):
 * C. MoS compliance for layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable with no original research?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * B. Inline citations to reliable sources where necessary (e.g., direct quotations):
 * C. No bare URLs WP:BAREURLS:
 * D. No original research:
 * E. No copyright violations:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

This being an excellent article now that the refimprove banner has been lifted, I am having no hesitation in passing, it is a GA review success. I would be recommending that this might be worthy of an FA nomination, it is easily the best article of those I have been reviewing to date. Very well done and thank you, Pi.1415926535. Regards,  Naz &#124;  talk  &#124;  contribs  14:06, 1 July 2016 (UTC)