Talk:Shoreline Mafia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 January 2019 and 17 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Camplatt10.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:33, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.pgsuite.com/calendar/2019/1/25/shoreline-mafia. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Citrivescence (talk) 00:33, 4 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi Citrivescence. I'm going to say with 100% certainty that the webpage in question (http://www.pgsuite.com/calendar/2019/1/25/shoreline-mafia) pulled the content from Wikipedia, not the other way around. The Wikipedia page was published on November 14, 2018 with the content at issue here. The webpage is an advertisement (or calendar listing) of Shoreline Mafia's scheduled performance at the Fillmore Silver Spring (a concert venue) on January 25, 2019. According to the venue's Twitter page, the performance was first announced on November 28, 2018, 14 days after the group's Wikipedia page (with the allegedly duplicated material) was created. Thus, the publisher of the webpage (a local magazine) could not have reasonably written the content at issue here prior to or on November 14 because, in the 14 days between the Wikipedia article's creation and the announcement of the group's January 2019 performance, the magazine would have had nothing to advertise and no reason to mention Shoreline Mafia (i.e. they couldn't have listed a show on their calendar that had yet to be announced). The most reasonable inference to make is that, at some point after the venue's November 28 announcement of the performance, the magazine pulled the small informative blurb from the Wikipedia article's lede to accompany their calendar listing.


 * Additionally, I wrote the group's Wikipedia article and have never been to the webpage or website in question. Although I know that, in itself, doesn't serve as proof, I do think I've demonstrated above that you erred in removing the content because the webpage would not have existed on November 14 when I wrote and published the article (the earliest the webpage could have existed is November 28). I don't know if there's a method for restoring the content according to Wikipedia policy, but I think it would be reasonable to do so as there is no ostensible copyright problem. Thanks. Gargleafg (talk) 04:45, 4 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Thanks for bringing this to my attention. I was wondering if that might be the case but wasn't sure when the other page was published. I've reverted the text deletion and I removed the copyvio template so I think that should be fine. Citrivescence (talk) 07:21, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Math
I like your songs and I subscribe them of a lot of songs you really do good 107.123.5.50 (talk) 01:37, 29 May 2022 (UTC) They should created more songs cause they are good singers so keep the great job