Talk:ShortCutz Amsterdam

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedily deleted because... speedy deletion is because of a username issue, not a content issue with the wiki-page --MovieMayhem (talk) 23:38, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Juries
I propose to remove the list of jury members. The section is for the most part sourced by related sources or IMDB. A type of source that HM Wilburt deems unfit. Beside that, the list consists mostly out of non-notable people (as in "no article available to prove notability"). The Banner talk 14:46, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * None of the sources in the jury section are from IMDB. So what is your point? HM Wilburt (talk) 14:57, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I advice you to read the section and check the sources. The Banner  talk 15:04, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * There are no IMDB sources in the Juries section. Why are you claiming there are? HM Wilburt (talk) 17:54, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * As I said: start reading!
 * 2017: https://www.imdb.com/list/ls033529958/ (listed as source 17)
 * 2018: https://www.imdb.com/list/ls033529958/ (listed as source 20)
 * The Banner talk 18:14, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * My bad. Of the 14 sources in that section only 1 is an IMDB link. The duplicate source 17/20 has been corrected. Issue resolved. HM Wilburt (talk) 18:23, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Nope. Still IMDb as source, that you deemed unfit. Still not-noteworthy people in the list. Still related sources, that you deemed unfit earlier. Still a dead link. The Banner  talk 18:27, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Looks like you are refusing to accept the other 13 sources. This probably has to do with your recent history to structurally remove anything related to vincent van ommen, am i correct? HM Wilburt (talk) 18:38, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Looks like you are not interested in a community discussion about keeping or removing this section. And please, do not come up with guesswork as argument. The Banner  talk 18:49, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Don't have to guess when you can look at your edit history. Want me to point you to your own edits/diffs? HM Wilburt (talk) 19:12, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I know what I did, no need to following me around. Your speculation is not of any use in this discussion. The Banner  talk 19:19, 10 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Hello hello, i think the jury is a well sourced section and relevant information to the page. We should keep it :-) 🌝Lucas🌞B🌎1991 (talk) 20:19, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * PS: please stop fighting. HM Wilburt don't accuse him of things. :-) 🌝Lucas🌞B🌎1991 (talk) 20:20, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Undid The Banner's edit because his removal of the table/section makes the presented information inaccurate. Furthermore the previous version has more accurate, verifiable and relevant information. HM Wilburt (talk) 00:23, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I have only removed non-notable jury-members and some layout to make the section less big. The Banner  talk 08:00, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
 * The way you are removing information makes the left over information inaccurate. You are removing year data and jury by year info and sources attached to that. Either rewrite that part properly or leave the previous version which holds more accurate information. Notability isn't a part of this page and only holds to BLP. I've undid your version again. Please do not undo it again unless accurate information can be remained. Also like to remind you to the 3RRR rule as to reverts. Thank you. HM Wilburt (talk) 08:04, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
 * The information is summarized with doubles and non-notable jury members removed. All your sources are still there. Clean it up when needed but refrain from selfpromo and editwarring. List dos and don'ts. The Banner  talk 08:51, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Again you've done nothing to improve the article. First you complain about lack of sources. Then more sources are added (which are all 3RS). Then you remove the whole section and start complaining about too many sources. You don't seem to actually want to improve the article. Seems like you just want to delete information. You've done four reverts for the same point without improving the section this week alone. Also don't start with this self-promo harassment again. HM Wilburt (talk) 09:32, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I did improve the article by removing non-notable jury-members and changing the space consuming list to plain prose. But all the sources are still there. The Banner  <i style="color:maroon">talk</i> 11:21, 26 July 2019 (UTC)