Talk:Shravakabuddha

I've deleted the remark that the Pali Canon does not refer to arahants as buddhas since it's contentious. Both some scholars & the commentaries interpret buddha in some canonical passages as meaning just that. Peter jackson 16:52, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

A different issue. Why is this article given a Sanskrit title when nobody seems to have found any examples of this term as actually existing, & the article is about the Pali term savakabuddha? Peter jackson 16:53, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

As I've had no response to requests in several places, including the talk page of the original author of this article, for any evidence that the Sanskrit word actually exists, I've moved it to the Pali form. Peter jackson (talk) 12:10, 23 January 2008 (UTC)