Talk:Shri Ram Chandra Mission

Archived old discussion
Moving very old discussions to archive page. Vishaalgautam (talk) 07:28, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Clean up
As indicated by the tag on top this article required a major clean up, I went through it and going to make following changes Vishaalgautam (talk) 12:11, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
 * remove promotional content
 * add content from reliable sources
 * remove links those are not from secondary sources
 * remove content that was based upon 25 yrs old Commission of 1995 report and was heavily disputed and criticized. Report from Commission of 1999 does not include this organization's name. In addition I tried to find any context to it in recent times and could not find any rather found this article which shows practice is prevalent in France, hence considering it as irrelevant will remove this content.
 * after making all the above changes, will remove the tags on top

Removal of COI tag
Hi, It has been verified by user here (search for Closer Comment), that there is no COI in my account, hence I am going to remove the tag you placed it in this article. I will keep other tags you placed, so we can improve on those things. Also there are some guidance given by which needs to be thought over for future directions. Xiantec (talk) 07:44, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
 * No, it has not been "verified" – one individual user simply said that they could not see how you had a COI. Closing a merge discussion does not imbue an individual editor with any powers to "verify" a lack of COI, but any editor is free to chip in with their opinions. Please do not remove the COI tag again. Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 09:24, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
 * , your COI claim is also not "verified". You have not given answer to my question, asked several times, asking for specifics, you have changed your reasoning, made changes without discussions and given threats of blocking. At this point, you are not leaving any option for me but to raise a dispute and get help from other experienced users or admins. Xiantec (talk) 09:56, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Don't worry, I have already consulted with administrators on this, and I have really been bending over backwards to assume good faith and give you a chance to voluntarily disclose the fact that you are involved with the Heartfulness Institute. I have never "given threats" – as you know, I am not able to block editors, and it is normal procedure to inform users through a series of escalating warnings when they keep violating Wikipedia policies. Note that even if you had not had a conflict of interest, you would not be allowed to promote the institute, the movement, the publications, and the people around it. --bonadea contributions talk 11:22, 13 December 2020 (UTC)