Talk:Shriya Saran/GA3

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Ashliveslove (talk · contribs) 11:40, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

This is the third time this article is been nominated for GA. By checking its backlog and reviews from previous discussions regarding the failed GA's I think more time and detail revision will be needed. Any other reviewer can see the last backlog here. ASHUIND  11:50, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Started the review process. ASHUIND  11:40, 5 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Have found that article is improved since its last nomination. Areas where it failed have been rewritten and expanded.
 * Non-copyrighted images are present with proper captions.


 * Problem
 * Found few dead links and have marked them in article.
 * Fixed. BollyJeff  ||  talk  13:43, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Overall
 * I'll be glad to provide it GA right on the way. Just waiting for the dead links to be removed. Want it to be clean when getting that green plus sign. ASHUIND  13:09, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Final Analysis

 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Article has preserved its quality till the review date and is well-written. ASHUIND  14:26, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Some references were found dead but were later improved and replaced. No such issue found again. ASHUIND  14:26, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * All such aspects have been covered perfectly till the date. ASHU</b><sup style="color:red;">IND  14:26, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Checks fine here.<b style="color:orange;">ASHU</b><sup style="color:red;">IND  14:26, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * No such epic battles fought here. Everything done is in good faith. <b style="color:orange;">ASHU</b><sup style="color:red;">IND  14:26, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * All images are proper till the review date and well captioned. <b style="color:orange;">ASHU</b><sup style="color:red;">IND  14:26, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * All images are proper till the review date and well captioned. <b style="color:orange;">ASHU</b><sup style="color:red;">IND  14:26, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:

Keep up the good quality of Article. Don't let it delisted. Regards. <b style="color:orange;">ASHU</b><sup style="color:red;">IND  14:26, 7 November 2011 (UTC)