Talk:Shut Up and Drive/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 17:25, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Get ready to be slayed. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 17:26, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I assume Te Amo will be finished first before any notion is thought about started this one. Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 18:55, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 03:50, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Status?
This review has been open for almost two weeks, with nothing to show so far. Please update on the status. If the reviewer is unable to complete the review in a timely manner, then allow another editor to take it over. AstroCog (talk) 15:01, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I will do it. I believe instead of doing hasty reviews, it is better to do a nice long review with practically every issues pointed out, right? Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 15:07, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Detailed is good. But "hasty" and "timely" are not the same thing. I just wanted to make sure that this review was not forgotten. AstroCog (talk) 15:27, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Don't worry. I never forget something i take under my belt. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 15:29, 13 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Media review
 * Music sample should be reduced to 21 second.
 * The image (in LP) and cover art are good (except remove the full stop).

Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 15:25, 13 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Fixed? Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 18:34, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Not. But, will do it shortly. ✅ — Tomica1111  &bull;  Question Existing?  08:49, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

I'll be finishing this review tomorrow. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 17:26, 18 December 2011 (UTC)


 * I will fix the prose myself. But do the references when I post them. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 13:31, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Why are you doing it yourself Jivesh?? Be careful of being accused of being to closely linked to the article, because I am sure there are people who would fail this based on the fact that you are amending things and not Tomcia. Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 15:13, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
 * It's ok. Many reviewers copy edit the article during their review and list issues if they are confused. — WP: PENGUIN  · [ TALK ]  15:26, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Hmm okay. I just don't think it is a good way of reviewing. How is the nominator mean't to learn from their mistakes? I guess it is just my way of thinking. Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 15:28, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Wow, you really follow my contributions. Lol. And Calvin, do you learn from your mistakes? Remember what I did on "Te Amo"?Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 15:29, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
 * That's my point. But I can see what is happening now anyway. Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 15:32, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
 * What is happening? — Tomica1111  &bull;  Question Existing?  15:33, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Stay calm please. It has been dealt with. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 15:37, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
 * No, contrary Jivesh. I am just asking what is happening, cause I can not understand. — Tomica1111  &bull;  Question Existing?  15:38, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I was actually talking about something else, but it doesn't matter. I've learn't not to say what I feel on here. Calvin  &bull; Watch  n'  Learn 15:41, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Read it from the beginning. I said I was going to c/e the article but Calvin said that it is not right from his pov. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 15:42, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

The copy-edits I Made

 * Lead ✅
 * Background and composition ✅
 * Critical reception ✅
 * Chart performance ✅
 * Music video ✅
 * Live performances ✅

Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 13:05, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks Jivesh. I am expecting the reference issues so I can resolve them. — Tomica1111  &bull;  Question Existing?  13:06, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Charts and certifications

 * Apply WP:ACCESS. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 13:08, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ — Tomica1111  &bull;  Question Existing?  14:13, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

More

 * 11. Check the publisher.
 * 12. Why is Slant Magazine listed twice? It is not supposed to be in italics.
 * 14. Link everything there
 * 15. Use citeweb
 * 26. Link Rap-Up
 * 27. Unlink and be consistent.
 * 28. Link Apple Inc
 * 34. citeweb
 * 37 & 38. Over-linking of Discogs
 * 58. Remove ARIA Charts and have a look at how you wrote the date. Be consistent.
 * 59. Why is Ultratop 50 in italics? + date
 * 60. Why is Ultratop 40 in italics? + date
 * 61. Why is ChartsPlus in italics? + link The Official Charts Company + date
 * 64. Refer to FN 3

Overall, the article was quite underprepared but it will pass. :D Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 12:26, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ all. Haha I couldn't understand your point, but it was very easy though xD ! — Tomica1111  &bull;  Question Existing?  12:36, 29 December 2011 (UTC)


 * 12. Why did you unlink Slant Magazine?

Please fix ^^^ and I am passing the article.


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 05:19, 30 December 2011 (UTC)