Talk:Shutter (2004 film)

Reference
The only given reference for the entire article now points to a non-existing article. Meta

Fair use rationale for Image:Shutterposter.jpg
Image:Shutterposter.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 18:17, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Critical Response Section
The Critical Response section just lists the RottenTomatoes score. But following the link to RottenTomatoes, one finds that most of the reviews there are actually of the 2008 American remake. So maybe until RottenTomatoes gets its act together, it would be better to include some snippets from a few reviews that are actually of the film, like other movie pages do, rather than list RT's erroneous percent score. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.238.243.172 (talk) 03:39, 19 September 2016 (UTC)