Talk:Shyam Swarup Agarwal/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs) 11:23, 7 December 2017 (UTC)


 * I propose reviewing this article which has been waiting for review for seven months. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:23, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks Mate, will wait for your comments --jojo@nthony (talk) 11:52, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

First reading

 * "His undergraduate studies ..." - This sentence is too long and needs splitting up. ✅ --jojo@nthony (talk) 12:45, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
 * "He superannuated" - This is not an expression I know but presumably means that he retired. ✅ --jojo@nthony (talk) 12:46, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
 * "He died on 2 December 2013" - Can you clarify that you are talking about the father here and not the son. ✅ --jojo@nthony (talk) 12:48, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
 * "... and as well as ..." - I don't think this "and" is wanted. sentence corrected --jojo@nthony (talk) 13:16, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Panax ginseng needs to be in italics in the caption and the main text. ✅ --jojo@nthony (talk) 13:02, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
 * "he became the founder head of the Medical Genetics and Clinical Immunology." - The head of what? An institute, a department, a course or what? corrected --jojo@nthony (talk) 13:09, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Wikilink or explain technical terms like seroepidemiology, phytopharmaceutical. ✅ --jojo@nthony (talk) 13:13, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
 * That's all for the time being. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:19, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
 * User:Cwmhiraeth, corrections done as per comments --jojo@nthony (talk) 12:25, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

GA criteria
I am happy with the improvements made in response to my comments.


 * The article is well written and complies with MOS guidelines on prose, grammar, structure and layout.
 * The article uses many reliable third-party sources, and makes frequent citations to them. I do not believe it contains original research.
 * The article covers the main aspects of the subject and remains focussed.
 * The article is neutral.
 * The article is stable.
 * The images are relevant and have suitable captions, and are either in the public domain or properly licensed.


 * Final assessment - I believe this article reaches the GA criteria. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 14:14, 9 December 2017 (UTC)