Talk:Sialk

Oh, and look, now it's still edit warring over BC/BCE dates, but is also covering it up by making 2 or 3 dozen minor gramatical changes--Aolanonawanabe 06:30, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

Aolanonawanabe,

I wasn't warring for I'd need an opponent to do so. You frequently make such mistakes and it does get tiresome. Either form is acceptable so long as it is consistent. Their wasn't a consistent form before my edits...check the history pages. Also I wasn't trying to hide any edits...it's impossible when you have a stalker. Chooserr 00:06, 13 December 2005 (UTC)


 * There wasn't a consistent form until my edit, and now with your revert, it's inconsistent again. -GTBacchus(talk) 00:16, 13 December 2005 (UTC)


 * I see it as consistent in my version can you sight which line it is that is inconcistent. Chooserr


 * Oh, come on. You can hit ctrl-F and type "BCE" as easily as I can; you'll see it in the phrase "6th millennium BCE"... nevermind, no you won't, I fixed it myself. -GTBacchus(talk) 00:24, 13 December 2005 (UTC)


 * I've been using the computer for a while but I've never used ctrl-F so I didn't know. Chooserr

proto-elamite
I added the "proto-elamite" article to the "Sialk" article. And changed the name of the civilization in the right column from "Sialk civilization" to "Proto-Elamite civilization". Does anyone know how to change the title of the article (to Proto-Elamite civilization)?


 * Why merge? And not even put to a vote? Or even a merge tag for discussion??


 * Sialk is a place where proto-elamite culture was observed, among other later settlements. It's like the Giza Pyramid or Ur Ziggurat.--Zereshk 23:18, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

Ok, sure. We can do it some other way if you want. But my only intention was to add the proto-elamites to the iranian history, they are after all a part of it. But if you think that Sialk is only a place, then why was it in the column as one of the civilizations of Iran? (Giza or Ur for example are not a part of the Egyptian and Iraqi history)

By the way, how do I put a merge tag on the article? (I'm new at this)


 * I fixed it. The Proto-elamites already appear on the History of Iran template as one of Iran's ruling kingdoms or dynasties. I however moved Sialk to the new name Teppe Sialk, its proper archeological name. That should fix the confusion, I hope.


 * Regards.


 * PS, to be a permanent user, log in, pick a username, and sign your posts by clicking on the second button from the right on top of the box where you type. Take care.--Zereshk 22:59, 4 April 2006 (UTC)