Talk:Siamese–Cambodian War (1591–1594)

Review
Why C class and not B class?
 * B2=no because article is missing an "Aftermath" or "Results" section. The introduction states that the country of Cambodia was subjugated but the narrative only states that Longvek was captured. The article ends abruptly at Longvek's fall. What happened as a result of the capture of Longvek? Did the Cambodians surrender? How long did it take for Cambodia to become independent again?
 * The article uses the word "Thai" to describe Ayutthayans. You and I know that Ayutthaya is the south and central part of modern Thailand, but most English-language readers do not know this. A short explanation of geography in the introduction is needed. Djmaschek (talk) 04:38, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

"Cambodia"
Linking to Cambodia, which covers the modern country, (compared with Ayutthaya Kingdom) seems rather off. I'm not sure if Dark ages of Cambodia would be the proper article to link to though. --Paul_012 (talk) 17:34, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

I'm Cambodian we hope foreigners stop write fake Cambodia history.
Siam start invade Cambodia 1588, 1591, the Last war 1593, Siam total army 340,000 troops with 50,000 navy troops attack Cambodia capital city Longvek with 120,000 troops of Cambodia national documents with Dutch historians recoding 1871.

Reference Société Asiatique (1871) Journal asiatique ou recueil de mémoires, d'extraits et de notices relatifs à l'histoire, à la philosophie, aux sciences, à la littérature et aux langues des peuples orientaux, Volume 99, Publisher: Dondey-Dupré, Original from National Library of the Netherlands Noreay (talk) 15:31, 19 March 2024 (UTC)


 * I don't think 19th century journals are as reliable as 20th century books on the subject. But I am no expert of course.--Catlemur (talk) 15:42, 19 March 2024 (UTC)