Talk:Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

I'm sorry, but this meets straight up quick-fail criteria.
 * The tone is in-universe for several sections and comes across somewhat as original research.
 * Prose in several sections is difficult to read.
 * Gameplay may be grossly over-detailed.
 * References are badly formatted, small amount of actual references for an article of this kind.
 * No real development section, no reception section.

Overall...I'm sorry, but whoever rated this B did so incorrectly, and it's more accurately a Start-class article. That's not to say effort hasn't clearly been shown, because it's very visible. It just needs a major tune up before it can proceed to GA. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kung Fu Man (talk • contribs) 04:25, July 2, 2009