Talk:Siege of Belgrade (1440)

Outcome
@OrionNimrod, the context regarding the outcome and the strength of the battle is not covered by the article body. Please include those and edit the infobox. Please consider reading the edit summary at least. Ajayraj890 (talk) 07:30, 11 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi @Ajayraj890, I added porper sources. I do no know where do you get this siege was "stalemate". The attackers did not occupied the castle and they did not move back to home after a "friendly camping" OrionNimrod (talk) 22:48, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
 * You should cover it on article body. Can you add those 'strength' parameters on the article body too? Ajayraj890 (talk) 03:09, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes, you can see I started to add sourced contents to the article, indeed this article was at very raw level. (Still I do not know how did you figure out the “stalemate”) OrionNimrod (talk) 08:56, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I put stalemate because nowhere in the article mentions the result of the event. Also, cover the article body with the context in the infobox. Ajayraj890 (talk) 09:08, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
 * You should ask “citation needed” or ask support for article extension to write in the related wikiprojects (Hungarian, Turkish, Serb…) not to invent unsourced new stories, because this is history falsification.
 * You can see I added already some text about the outcome in the lead and quote below, but of course this article is quite poor at the moment. OrionNimrod (talk) 10:36, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Then expand it. How am I supposed to know while the infobox doesn't deflect the information as of the article body? Ajayraj890 (talk) 14:12, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
 * “Stalemate” was also not in the article body. OrionNimrod (talk) 16:43, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I put that because there was no result. Especially for the siege, after reading the article body, I prefer to not leave a blank space on result parameter Ajayraj890 (talk) 16:56, 12 November 2023 (UTC)