Talk:Siege of Buda (1849)

Link for the Army Day
Here is the source for the Army Day

http://jelesnapok.oszk.hu/prod/unnep/a_magyar_honvedelem_napja

Monkap (talk) 08:51, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 one external links on Battle of Buda (1849). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081006215921/http://www.zmne.hu:80/tanszekek/kvt/digitgy/20021/hadtud/csikany.html to http://www.zmne.hu/tanszekek/kvt/digitgy/20021/hadtud/csikany.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090216124606/http://bparchiv.hu:80/magyar/kiadvany/bpn/29_30/hermann.html to http://www.bparchiv.hu/magyar/kiadvany/bpn/29_30/hermann.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 14:06, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Battle of Buda (1849). Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
 * Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.geocities.com/tapir32hu/szabads.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 18:30, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

NPOV?
Aside from the stylistic issues already marked by the copy template, the article uses a lot of language that is questionably neutral at best - "senseless bombardment", "crush the Hungarian revolution", &c., and seems to contain some original research - "This indicates that the arguments of those historians who wrote...are wrong..." --Tkanus (talk) 10:03, 28 August 2021 (UTC)