Talk:Siege of Krujë (1450)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: WikiCopter (talk) 19:05, 9 October 2010 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Change motivation in the lead to a more indisputable word or add a citation. WikiCopter (radio &bull; sorties &bull;  images &bull;  shot down) 19:53, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
 * How about "Skanderbeg's exhortations?"--Gaius Claudius Nero (talk) 16:20, 10 October 2010 (UTC)


 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Checkup on the last two sentences of the last section. If possible, change the youtube link to a published source. Add a source to the last sentence. If you have none, use the book itself. WikiCopter (radio &bull; sorties &bull;  images &bull;  shot down) 03:34, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure where to get a published source for the scene, but I will put in the movie which it is taken from. I s it fine if I keep the video link in there?--Gaius Claudius Nero (talk) 16:20, 10 October 2010 (UTC)


 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Good for GA, although leans slightly toward the Albanians. You might have some trouble there at FAC. WikiCopter (radio &bull; sorties &bull;  images &bull;  shot down) 03:34, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Good work, Gaius. WikiCopter (radio &bull; sorties &bull;  images &bull;  shot down) 01:51, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
 * How are the fixes?--Gaius Claudius Nero (talk) 00:19, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Excellent
 * Thanks for taking the time to review this article!--Gaius Claudius Nero (talk) 01:58, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
 * How are the fixes?--Gaius Claudius Nero (talk) 00:19, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Excellent
 * Thanks for taking the time to review this article!--Gaius Claudius Nero (talk) 01:58, 11 October 2010 (UTC)