Talk:Siege of Malta (1798–1800)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Auntieruth55 (talk) 01:21, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

I have taken the liberty of boldly making some tweaks and copy edits for clarity and prose issues. There are some areas that are ambiguous.
 * Valetta or Valleta. Pick one.
 * who learned of the invasion of Malta off Sicily and attempted to intercept the French on their passage to Egypt. He learned of the invasion when he was in the vicinity of Sicily, or Malta is near Sicily?
 * what flagship was lost by fire? (Keith's?)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * I boldly made some ce and tweaks. please check.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:

Thankyou very much. I am extremely busy at work at the moment, but I'll get on to these problems (and the ones on the other article) when I can. Regards--Jackyd101 (talk) 21:24, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Thankyou. I think all points have now been addressed. Regards.--Jackyd101 (talk) 02:03, 7 February 2010 (UTC)