Talk:Siege of Mecca (683)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 18:30, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

I'll get to this shortly--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:30, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Is recant the right word? Perhaps acknowledge would be more appropriate, but I'm not sure what you mean by this.
 * Good point, this was a leftover from an earlier phrasing. Fixed now.


 * External links OK, no DABs
 * Images appropriately licensed.
 * and starting on 24 September placed the city under siege awkward
 * Removed the 'starting'.


 * Suggest adding |lastauthoramp=y to the cite book template for multi-author works to match the ampersand used in the cites.
 * Wasn't aware of this parameter, thanks.


 * Nicely done.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:16, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi Sturmvogel 66, done. Any further comments/suggestions? Constantine  ✍  14:34, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
 * No, you put the whole thing into the context of the succession dispute pretty well.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:23, 11 August 2019 (UTC)