Talk:Siege of Sardis (498 BC)

Redirect proposal
I'm trying to improve the depth of coverage for the Greco-Persian wars across all articles, and get all of them up to at least Good Article status. However, this article, is problematic, for one main reason: as far as the ancient sources tell, there military engagement here was minimal. The article can never be satisfactorily expanded, because the Greeks came, burnt the city, and then left. There's nothing else to say, and no other details in the ancient sources.

Thus, I don't think it really needs a separate article.

I think that the events at Sardis in 498 BC can be adequately covered at Ionian Revolt, without needing a separate article. I suggest leaving this page as a redirect to the above article, and moving any content which is not already covered there, to Ionian Revolt. The Greco-Persian Wars navigation box would still have "Sardis" in it, but now directing to the appropriate subsection of the Ionian Rcvolt article. This is the approach I have used for some other battles which are clearly not going to have a full article written about them.

Ultimately, if the consensus is that this deserves its own article, then I will not contest that. Having checked briefly, it appears that are probably not many editors with a vested interest in this article. No-one has ever commented on the talk page, and no-one has made a significant contribution to this article since April 2008. Some of those editors seem to be inactive or banned. So, I will wait one week for any opinions, and then act as described above.MinisterForBadTimes (talk) 16:35, 18 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Almost a week, and not a squeak, so I've gone ahead with the redirect. It can easily be reverted if anyone strongly disagrees. MinisterForBadTimes (talk) 19:03, 23 April 2009 (UTC)