Talk:Siege of Savage's Old Fields/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 17:37, 5 February 2012 (UTC)


 * I will review this article shortly. Looks good! MathewTownsend (talk) 17:37, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

GA review-see WP:WIAGA for criteria (and here for what they are not)


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose: clear and concise, correct spelling and grammar:
 * B. Complies with MoS for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Provides references to all sources:
 * B. Provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary:
 * Off line sources AGF
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Main aspects are addressed:
 * Provides the historical setting
 * B. Remains focused:
 * 1) Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Great article. I made a few edits which you are free to revert. (Both by British and English spell checker spell "backcountry" as back country, so I changed it throughout the article.) I added some links for my own benefit so I could understand.
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Great article. I made a few edits which you are free to revert. (Both by British and English spell checker spell "backcountry" as back country, so I changed it throughout the article.) I added some links for my own benefit so I could understand.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Great article. I made a few edits which you are free to revert. (Both by British and English spell checker spell "backcountry" as back country, so I changed it throughout the article.) I added some links for my own benefit so I could understand.
 * Great article. I made a few edits which you are free to revert. (Both by British and English spell checker spell "backcountry" as back country, so I changed it throughout the article.) I added some links for my own benefit so I could understand.
 * Great article. I made a few edits which you are free to revert. (Both by British and English spell checker spell "backcountry" as back country, so I changed it throughout the article.) I added some links for my own benefit so I could understand.

MathewTownsend (talk) 20:44, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Your edits look fine.  Magic ♪piano 01:58, 6 February 2012 (UTC)