Talk:Sigizmund Krzhizhanovsky

Untitled
If he is Polish-Ukrainian shouldn't he be in category Ukrainian and Polish writers if he wasn't ethnic Russian ? --Molobo 18:12, 23 March 2006 (UTC) According to this:  Zygmunt Krzyżanowski wrote in Russian but till his death consider himself a Pole living in emmigration in Russia. --Molobo 18:14, 23 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Molobo, your continuing stalking may lead to a severe punishment from admins. Take care, Ghirla -трёп- 18:26, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

Hm ? --Molobo 18:33, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

The current version of his name scores only 161 hits. Zygmunt Krzyzanowski scores 651 hits. It seems we should rename it. --Molobo 19:21, 23 March 2006 (UTC)


 * I have 650 vs. 878. Yet the google doesn't perform well for Cyrillic searches: Yandex search yields 2379 items. Please take a note that the current spelling is used by major media outlets of the English speaking world such as The Financial Times, while your search is confined to Polish-language websites, many of which refer to other dudes no doubt. --Ghirla -трёп- 19:43, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

I always use exact spelling and exact name. Neverthless Polish name should also be included. As the article states that he wasn't Russian and of mixed Polish-Ukrainian heritage and we have a source that he believed himself Pole I will change the incorrect category of Russian writer to Polish and Ukrainian one. --Molobo 19:49, 23 March 2006 (UTC)


 * If you want another edit war, little troll, go ahead. Your delations on talk pages of other users and national notice-boards may get you in trouble, however. --Ghirla -трёп- 19:29, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

Hm ? --Molobo 19:33, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

See my reply at Wikipedia_talk:Polish_Wikipedians%27_notice_board. I oppose the removal of the R/U cats, but addition of more info about his P side would be useful.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 21:33, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

Move
Shouldn't this article be moved to some other title? I'm not sure which would be the best one, but I'm pretty confident that the current one is plainly wrong. I'd support either his original Polish name (Zygmunt Krzyżanowski) or a proper transliteration of its Russian version (Sigizmund Kzhizhanovskiy). The Krzh thingie seems like a left-over from an improper transliteration to Russian to me, though he might've been using that version as well.  // Halibutt 06:53, 24 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Krzhizhanovsky is the usual translation of Russian Кржижановский. "Рж" (rzh) is the historical Russianization of Polish "rz". Technically you're right about -skiy, but it is common to simplify that to -sky (compare Tchaikovsky, Stravisnky, Dostoevsky, etc., and see WP:RUS). As for whether to use the Polish or the Russian form, I would lean towards keeping the Russian one, since he lived most of his adult life in Russia and Ukraine and wrote in Russian. Lesgles (talk) 03:21, 23 January 2013 (UTC)