Talk:Sigmar Berg

This is a terribly written.
It reads more like an advertising pamphlet, with almost no objectivity, than a Wiki article. 92.237.76.10 (talk) 17:29, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Inappropriate sources
Many of the sources found for this article are simply website reviews, or similar types of sources which are not objective. SouthofMidnight (talk) 02:43, 1 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Agreed. Is it OK to just remove the parts that feel like blatant advertisements?
 * It’s particularly bad because one of the top searches for the frequency mentioned is followed by “Wikipedia“ (e.g. “xyz Hz Wikipedia”) and this article may show as the top result. Apparently, scientific evidence supporting the claims made about the tone is limited. Iforget2020 (talk) 06:44, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

+Beryll
When checking the actual website for this company, it is nearly copy pasted from the about section. One major thing has been changed, which is the first name. Petra Berg is the "creative force" behind the company. So it appears this company has either kept the same story of someone who appears to be his wife, or just changed the first name of the person. SouthofMidnight (talk) 03:04, 1 December 2023 (UTC)