Talk:Signal 30 (Mad Men)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 01:20, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * Quality of article is very good.
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * See comment section below. Good.
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * See comment section below. Good.
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * See comment section below. Good.
 * C. No original research:
 * See comment section below. Good.
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * All major aspects of the topic have been covered.
 * B. Focused:
 * Article remains focused throughout.
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * No bias found.
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * Article is stable.
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * Non-free image uses a fair use rationale.
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * Image used is appropriate and has a suitable caption.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass!--Dom497 (talk) 19:30, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Comments

 * In the production section of the article, what's the need for paragraphs 2,3, and 4? Those paragraphs sound like they should be in the plot section of the article. Please clarify for me.


 * "Cast member John Slattery, who portrays Roger Sterling on the series, directed the episode, the third time he has directed for the series" needs a reference.

I have fixed all the other minor problems within the article and the two points mentioned above are the only things that need to be addressed. The article will be on hold for 7 days. If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message here or on my talk page.--Dom497 (talk) 15:20, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The paragraphs in production is, for the most, information from the "Inside Mad Men" featurettes on AMC.com, which gives the writers and actors time to elaborate on matters such as character motivation and the thematic material for the episode; matters relating to the creative process of the episode. Not much of those lines would fit in plot, though they do recount some matter of plot to put those lines in context. I provided a reference, as well. Penny Lane&#39;s America (talk) 19:59, 23 June 2012 (UTC)


 * I see know. Thanks for clarifying! I have passed the article.--Dom497 (talk) 19:30, 24 June 2012 (UTC)