Talk:Sikorsky H-19 Chickasaw

MI-4?
Why all the crap (including a picture) of some Soviet copycat? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.158.61.139 (talk) 20:28, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 * While the Mi-4 was by no means a copycat of the S-55/H-19 (In fact it was more comparible in capability to the S-58), I agree that discussion of the Mi-4 doesn't really belong here.Nigel Ish (talk) 20:45, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Why article named "H-19" rather than "S-55"?
Hi, out of curiosity, wouldn't the article name be more generic if the Sikorsky designation S-55 is used, instead of the USAF one (i.e.: H-19). Just a suggestion. Regards, DPdH (talk) 17:19, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Typo
Chile not Chili 118.210.215.241 (talk) 21:18, 30 May 2024 (UTC)