Talk:Silliwood

POV tag
This concerns POV tag cleanup. Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it. This permits discussion and consensus among editors. This is a drive-by tag, which is discouraged in WP, and it shall be removed. Future tags should have discussion posted as to why the tag was placed, and how the topic might be improved. Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements. This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags. No discussion, no tag.Jjdon (talk) 19:52, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

POV tag
This article is blatantly bad form, calling something a pile of crap isn't exactly unbiased — Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.104.230.148 (talk) 09:55, 22 February 2015 (UTC)


 * I agree, many POV words have been used. " failed video game", " result gamers were given such quality productions as", "But the byproducts of Silliwood weren't all terrible, and some decent titles still managed to squeeze their way out of the crap pile.". This whole article is clearly just one person's opinion on the Silliwood video games. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:55, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Silliwood. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071021012634/http://rccs.usfca.edu:80/bookinfo.asp?ReviewID=70&BookID=73 to http://rccs.usfca.edu/bookinfo.asp?ReviewID=70&BookID=73

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 05:30, 21 March 2016 (UTC)