Talk:Silvertip shark

Human interactions
This edit: it has been assessed as of Least Concern, at the end of the section "Human interactions" does not read well. That's why I changed it to it has been assessed as "Least Concern". Axl ¤  [Talk]  18:56, 25 May 2009 (UTC)


 * OK, feel free to change it back then. But could you also put quotes around any other IUCN statuses in the prose (not the infobox), to maintain consistency? -- Yzx (talk) 17:45, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks. [Although there aren't any other IUCN statuses in the prose.] Axl  ¤  [Talk]  07:07, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Distribution
The distribution map indicates presence in the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean, but the article states their presence there is unconfirmed. Shouldn't the map be changed to corroborate the text of the article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.162.12.96 (talk) 03:19, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Wrong map?
Hi from Czech. I just translated this article to czech, but... I think in article is wrong map, because in article you said: "Its presence in the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean Sea is unconfirmed". Krvesaj (talk) 22:07, 8 December 2010 (UTC)