Talk:Silvia Odio

For future reference
- Location (talk) 03:55, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
 * http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=xAAmAAAAIBAJ&sjid=9fMFAAAAIBAJ&pg=4564%2C5363130
 * http://www.independent.ie/entertainment/books-arts/waiting-for-the-smoking-gun-26457976.html

Lead sentence
The lead sentence appears to imply the subject was "... jailed for his attempt to assassinate Fidel Castro in 1962." This implication can be taken from the lead if the word "who" is taken as referring to the subject and not her father. To make the lead sentence less ambiguous, it would be better reworded so that "who" is replaced with "whose father", which would make more sense. However, the sentence is mostly irrelevant as the deeds of the father are not the deeds of the daughter, as Notability is not inherited. The lead sentence, should articulate the subject's claim to notability. It should not be about the subject's relationship to her father, and what he is notable for, but about the subject's own claim to notability, which is the evidence she gave to the Warren Commission. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 22:09, 25 March 2022 (UTC)