Talk:Simdesk/Archives/2016

Untitled
Original research?

article deletion
Folks, if you want to keep this article, you will need to start writing up stuff and citing references. From my understanding of Simdesk, there *could* be an article written that passes WP:CORP. The article needs to keep a Neutral Point of View, but if the primary things that simcorp is known for are negative, then that's fine. There is no reason why this article should be a fluff piece. Wrs1864 01:17, 15 October 2006 (UTC)


 * As simdesk is mentioned in USA TODAY, in an article that does seem optimistic on Simdesk's possibilities, but is not a direct copy of a press release (I don't suppose that USA TODAY does journalism like that), it already passes the WP:CORP criteria for a product or company. Furthermore, the event that a city like Houston does the risky step of moving from MS Office to the unkown simdesk suite is rather notable. Therefore, this article should _not_ be deleted! Otherwise, where would people from Houston look to see what this simdesk stuff is all about? I think that the 'deletion' tag should be replaced by a 'stub' tag. Anyone who agrees/disagrees? -- Mipmip 06:42, 18 October 2006 (UTC)