Talk:Simon Zadek

puff removed a bit
Almost the entire article is sourced to ... Simon Zadek. I removed the worst of the promotional puff. Collect (talk) 11:50, 23 September 2012 (UTC)


 * About half the article still consists of a list of Zadek's publications. Without the puff, it's rather clear that there is little context for the list. No third party reviews are there now, and I'm not finding much myself. Google scholar results don't seem to include any on this list among Zadek's most cited publications — his most cited publications tend to be a little older, and I haven't walked into any reviews of those, either. Reviews or other coverage would at least give some context. So I think the glut of self-referenced (down to the personal domain) publications should go, especially considering it was among obviously promotional additions by an editor associated with the subject. Individual publications might be worth replacing, if there's some indication as to their significance. JFHJr (㊟) 17:44, 23 September 2012 (UTC)