Talk:Simona Sharoni

COI
COI added because article originated from, and is periodically edited by, subject of article. Violation of Wikipedia neutrality guidelines. Haliaeetus71 (talk) 01:47, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

References neutrality
Neutrality check requested due to extensive list of references pointing to the same ethical dispute. My understanding of References is it should be representative and not exhaustive. Since this is a BLP and edited by the subject, neutrality is in question. Rather than edit the additional references out, I am requesting discussion.

Haliaeetus71 (talk) 23:32, 9 May 2018 (UTC) Haliaeetus71 (talk) 23:32, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If you're referring to the Lingere incident, I believe that the Washington Post story should stay in, because it was the first major story about it; the Chronicle of Higher Education and Inside Higher Ed should stay in, because they are major reliable news magazines in the field and covered it in detail. It's hard to do a responsible job of deleting references, because you have to make sure that you don't delete a reference that supports the text of the article. --Nbauman (talk) 19:25, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Simonasharoni (talk) 01:02, 8 June 2018 (UTC) 9:02, 7 June 2018.

Notability?
By what metric is this person notable to warrant a Wikipedia article? After reading WP:ACADEMIC I did not find a single criterion I could apply in good faith. What is your take on this? Wefa (talk) 05:23, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I'd like to also add that there aren't any articles that link to this one. Hickland (talk) 04:23, 31 January 2019 (UTC)