Talk:Simpsons Bible Stories/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer:  R uby2010   comment!  20:42, 23 July 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Comments

 * There are several dabs that need fixing
 * "to have a "Tony British" accent." Do you mean Tory?
 * Nope, the commentary says it's "Tony British" accent (no, I don't know what it is either).


 * Remove caps in titles on ref numbers 11, 12, and 18
 * Make sure sentences with quotes end with citations
 * Jake MacNeill was also critical, and wrote that the episode "fails to be funny" because it "strays too far from the source material." He added "have you read the bible? That stuff’s funny enough in and of itself." Source?
 * What makes this a reliable source?
 * Not reliable. Removed.

On hold for seven days. Thanks,  R uby2010   comment!  21:12, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review! I think I've fixed all the problems now. Queenieacoustic (talk) 10:24, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Your changes look great. Pass for GA. Nice work  R uby2010   comment!  13:41, 24 July 2011 (UTC)