Talk:Sinclair Scientific/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Cirt (talk · contribs) 02:00, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

I will review this article. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 02:00, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Image review
&mdash; Cirt (talk) 04:31, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
 * One image, used in infobox, image hosted at Commons..

Stability review
&mdash; Cirt (talk) 04:31, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Upon inspection of article edit history, going back over two months, no major problems.
 * 2) Looked at talk page history, going back to existence of page, no outstanding issues.

Successful good article nomination
I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of January 22, 2014, compares against the six good article criteria:


 * 1. Well written?: Writing quality is good for GA. I would recommend both WP:GOCE and WP:PR as optional next steps.
 * 2. Factually accurate?: Duly cited throughout, good standardization of reference formatting.
 * 3. Broad in coverage?: Covers major aspects.
 * 4. Neutral point of view?: Written in neutral tone. Facts are given in matter of fact wording.
 * 5. Article stability? See above, passes here.
 * 6. Images?: See above, passes here.

If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations. — &mdash; Cirt (talk) 05:41, 22 January 2014 (UTC)