Talk:Sind (caliphal province)

Spelling of place names
With the exception of "Iraq", this article seems to use transliterated Arabic names for places, rather than the most common English names. This makes it difficult for a non-Arabic speaker to recognize the places being discussed. For example: While the transliterated names are more "correct", Wikipedia uses whatever names are most common in English to maximize understanding of the text. Kaldari (talk) 19:19, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
 * al-Sind instead of Sindh
 * al-Basrah instead of Basra
 * al-Multan instead of Multan

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the proposal was moved to List of caliphal governors of Sind. --BDD (talk) 19:01, 22 October 2012 (UTC) (non-admin closure)

List of caliphal governors of al-Sind → List of caliphal governors of Sindh – "Sindh" rather than "al-Sind" is the most common name for the province in English (and also the title of the Wikipedia article on the province). Per WP:COMMONNAME, the title should reflect the most common English name. If there is a reason to use "al-Sind" rather than "Sindh", the titles of the other articles should be changed as well to be consistent. Otherwise it is confusing to readers. Kaldari (talk) 19:24, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Support List of caliphal governors of Sind (without 'h') per WP:COMMONNAME. --RJFF (talk) 10:52, 18 October 2012 (UTC) Edited after I saw Ro4444's comment --RJFF (talk) 10:39, 21 October 2012 (UTC)


 * 1) Partial oppose. I have no objection to removing the definite article from the title. On the other hand, I believe that changing the name from "Sind" to "Sindh" should not be done. While it's true that the more common English name for the contemporary province is Sindh, it's more common in modern sources to call the region Sind when referring to the historical period in question. Similar to Palaestina Prima rather than Palestine I, Jund al-Urdunn rather than Jordan, Ifriqiya rather than Africa, etc., because the former names are more common to refer to those regions during the ancient/medieval era. For that reason, I feel like the use of Sind is more appropriate under WP:COMMONNAME. Clarification that the modern name is Sindh can be added in the text, if need be. Ro4444 (talk) 21:19, 20 October 2012 (UTC)


 * You're right, I support the move with the amendment that "Sind" should be spelled without 'h' in this context. --RJFF (talk) 10:39, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.