Talk:Singel Uitgeverijen

Proposed mergers into Singel Uitgeverijen
One publishing group with a shared history and present operations. Without the merger, these articles suffer from a lack of content, references, and updates. Please note that this is a merger discussion. Valid arguments are about information organization, not about notability. The notability of all Singel Uitgeverijen is assumed but irrelevant to the discussion. gidonb (talk) 12:44, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Done for Conserve (an imprint), but oppose for De Arbeiderspers and Nijgh & Van Ditmar as their long independent histories are best covered separately, with some possibility for expansion/referencing from the Dutch. Readers would be best served by having the distinct histories covered on separate pages. Klbrain (talk) 13:07, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Closing, given the uncontested objection (and no support) for the remaining 2 proposals. Klbrain (talk) 10:30, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Proposed merge of De Arbeiderspers into Singel Uitgeverijen
The content of De Arbeiderspers (slightly cleaned up) is BADLY needed at Singel Uitgeverijen. The current situation of excessive fragmentation contributes to a severe lack of upkeep at De Arbeiderspers and a nightmare of a user experience! gidonb (talk) 04:34, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
 * As there were no objections, I am moving ahead and going to merge. gidonb (talk) 02:59, 25 February 2024 (UTC)